Tutorial on Argument and Fallacy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argument Tutorial
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the importance of constructing arguments with supporting evidence, highlighting the distinction between valid arguments and mere contradictions. Key resources shared include the "Argument Clinic" and a logical fallacies guide on Wikipedia. The conversation also introduces the "Fallacy of Stolen Concept," illustrating how certain arguments undermine their own validity by presupposing the truth of what they seek to disprove. Participants emphasize the need for clarity and coherence in argumentative discourse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logical argumentation principles
  • Familiarity with common logical fallacies
  • Basic knowledge of the "Modus Ponens" logical structure
  • Awareness of resources like Wikipedia for logical fallacies
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the "Fallacy of Stolen Concept" in depth
  • Study the "Argument Clinic" for practical examples of argumentation
  • Research additional logical fallacies on "www.fallacyfiles.org"
  • Learn how to effectively counter fallacious arguments in debates
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for philosophers, debaters, educators, and anyone interested in enhancing their argumentative skills and understanding logical reasoning.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,504
Reaction score
7,433
Science news on Phys.org
Astronuc said:
I stumbled across this and thought some might find it useful.

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html

and this as well

The Argument Clinic - http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/sn-python.html

The objective of argument or disputation is not only take an opposing position, but to provide evidence to support one's position. Otherwise, as is pointed out in the MP sketch, it's simply contradiction.

That's cool, I use wikipedia for logical fallacies, it's got some really great posts about them, and they are logical which makes a change for wikipedia, I accused Vanesch of being guilty of one not two weeks ago :smile:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_ponens

In relation to MWI :smile: as the theory assumes QT is correct :smile: I don't think he agreed though.
 
Last edited:
Here is one that they missed:

Fallacy of Stolen Concept - An argument where your argument against the truth value of something implicitly demands that you accept the truth value of the thing you are trying to disprove in order to disprove it, making the argument incoherent and contradictory.

ex.

- "language is meaningless" - If language is meaningless, then the statement "language is meaningless" is itself meaningless. When making the argument, you presuppose the meaningfulness of language.
- "Truth does not exist" - If there is no such thing as truth, then it cannot possibly be true that there is no such thing as truth.
- "I do not exist" - The speaker makes a statement about herself, and as such, presumes her own existence.
- "Reality is an illusion" - The very concept "illusion" is derived from the concept "reality"; that is, the concept "illusion" makes absolutely no sense, unless there is indeed "reality" with which it may be contrasted"

etc.
 
Moridin said:
Here is one that they missed:

Fallacy of Stolen Concept - An argument where your argument against the truth value of something implicitly demands that you accept the truth value of the thing you are trying to disprove in order to disprove it, making the argument incoherent and contradictory.

ex.

- "language is meaningless" - If language is meaningless, then the statement "language is meaningless" is itself meaningless. When making the argument, you presuppose the meaningfulness of language.
- "Truth does not exist" - If there is no such thing as truth, then it cannot possibly be true that there is no such thing as truth.
- "I do not exist" - The speaker makes a statement about herself, and as such, presumes her own existence.
- "Reality is an illusion" - The very concept "illusion" is derived from the concept "reality"; that is, the concept "illusion" makes absolutely no sense, unless there is indeed "reality" with which it may be contrasted"

etc.


Don't tell those to the new agers. They thrive on these concepts.
 
"www.fallacyfiles.org"[/URL] does a lot of categorization of the various fallacies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And when debating with someone who repeatedly relies on fallacious arguments despite your best efforts to point out the error in their logic, it's best to take the upper road and refrain from sending them http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borg, jim mcnamara and Enigman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
15K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K