Laplaces equation in polar coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Laplace's equation in polar coordinates, specifically focusing on a function \( u(r,\theta) \) that satisfies the equation within a defined wedge and under certain boundary conditions. Participants are exploring the implications of these conditions and the general solution form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive a solution for Laplace's equation given specific boundary conditions and expresses confusion regarding the necessity of setting certain coefficients to zero in a related problem. Other participants question the implications of linear independence of functions in the context of boundary conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the reasoning behind the boundary conditions and the implications of linear independence. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the functions involved, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework rules, emphasizing the importance of showing their attempts and reasoning rather than seeking direct solutions.

catcherintherye
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
The function u(r,\theta)

satisfies Laplace's equation in the wedge 0 \leq r \leq a, 0 \leq \theta \leq \beta

with boundary conditions u(r,0) = u(r,\beta) =0, u_r(a,\theta)=h(\theta). Show that

u(r,\theta) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty A_nr^{n\pi/\beta}sin(\frac{n\pi\theta}{\beta})

A_n=a^{1-\frac{n\pi}{\beta}\frac{2}{n\pi}\int_{0}^{\beta}h(\theta)sin\frac{n\pi\theta}{\beta}d\theta
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have posted here before so surely you know the basic rules!

No one is going to do your homework for you and it wouldn't help you if they did! Show us what you have tried so we can see where you went wrong or got stuck.
 
I saw the question, realized I was incapable and thought I'd put it up for some hints... I do have a similar problem viz laplace in the unit circle...


\nabla^2U=0

Boundary conditions are 1) U=0 at r=0

2) U(1,\theta)=2cos\theta

now I have quoted from the notes that the general solution is

U(r,\theta) =C_0lnr + D_0 + \sum_{0}^\infty(C_0r+\frac{D_0}{r^n}).(A_ncosn\theta + B_nsinn\theta)

now I am told that B.C 1 implies D_0 = 0=C_n for n=0,1,2,3,4...

I am immediately confused why it is necessary to have these two coeffiecient set to zero, surely we could have some situation whereby the three terms could cancel to zero without insisting their coefficients are zero??
 
Last edited:
The sines, cosines and the constant function are linearly independent on the unit circle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K