How Is the Acidity or Basicity of Amino Acids Determined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jones106
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acids Amino acids
AI Thread Summary
The acidity or basicity of amino acids is primarily determined by the pKa values of their side chains (R groups), rather than the carboxyl or amino groups, which have similar pKa values across amino acids. The pKa of the R group indicates whether an amino acid is acidic or basic, with specific amino acids exhibiting unique R group pKa values that influence their overall charge at physiological pH. If an amino acid has additional acidic groups, it would likely become more negatively charged, while more basic groups would increase its positive charge. Understanding these pKa values is crucial for predicting the behavior of amino acids in biological systems. The discussion highlights the importance of R group pKa values in determining amino acid properties.
jones106
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How can you tell if a given amino acid is acidic or basic? I'm lost here. My first thought would be to look at the pKa values. There is virtually no difference in the pKa values for the carboxyl groups; all range from 1.82-2.38. The same goes for the pKa values of the amino groups; all range from 8.8-10.96. Is it the pKa of the R group that determines whether they are acidic or basic? I'm staring at this table, and it only has pKa values for the R groups of 7 of the amino acids.

Thanks very much,
Taylor
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What would happen if there were more acidic groups on an amino acid or more basic groups on an amino acid?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top