Making Fermionic Condensates: Overcoming the Exclusion Principle

  • Thread starter Thread starter p_branes
  • Start date Start date
p_branes
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
My question is that how did people actually make a fermionic condensate? I would think this would be extremely difficult as the exclusion principle states that fermions cannot be in the same quantum state so how ebactly did people achieve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p_branes said:
My question is that how did people actually make a fermionic condensate? I would think this would be extremely difficult as the exclusion principle states that fermions cannot be in the same quantum state so how ebactly did people achieve this?

They can't be in the same quantum state. Remember that if you describe a free particle as plane waves, there are two quantum numbers, n and k, that describe such a system. You can have two fermions having the same n, but having k1 and -k1 quantum numbers, k2 and -k2, etc...

For Cooper pairs in conventional superconductors, this is exactly the case. Equal but opposite electrons k's for two electrons pair up forming a singlet state. So for example, you have one pair with k1 and -k1, another pair having k2 and -k2, etc... So essentially, each fermions are STILL uniquely different as far as their quantum numbers are concerned. If n1,k1 is already taken, another electron cannot scatter into that state.

The difficulty in understanding all this is that the "single-particle" statistics for fermions is still obeyed. However, when you consider a bound pair, you now have to consider the two-particle statistics, which can be very different if these particle are bosons (or composite bosons in this case).

Zz.
 
A fermionic condensate is actually composed of particles which can form pairs. The paired up fermions act as if they were collectively a boson, and then the bosons Bose-Einstein condense.

http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/1/14

- Warren
 
Thanks now i get it.
 
i think they made fermionic condensate cos i saw it in "Focus" the other day
 
Sometime things on here don't get followed up, or forgotten and another new string starts up asking the same thing all over again.

As a follow up to this, don't miss the new report on the further development of the saga of the Fermionic condensate. This time a pair of reports (still not out officially yet) have confirmed the occurence of pairing in a fermionic gas upon condensation. This will be an analogous process occurring in superconductors with the formation of Cooper pairs.

http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/7/12

The earlier report by the Deborah Jin's group only reported a condensation in a fermionic gas. They could not observe any pairing but hinted that it could happen. This new report seals the deal.

Zz.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
805
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top