Solving Fraction Addition: Understanding Common Denominators

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on adding the fractions 7/(x - 3) and 1/(3 - x) by finding a common denominator. The key point is recognizing that 3 - x can be rewritten as -(x - 3), allowing for identical denominators. The confusion arises from the placement of the negative sign, which can be in either the numerator or denominator without changing the value of the fraction. Ultimately, both approaches yield the same result, but the preference for writing negative signs varies among individuals. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity and conciseness in mathematical expressions.
Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
Consider the addition of 2 fractions:

\displaystyle{\frac{7}{x - 3} + \frac{1}{3 - x}}

We know we must find a least common denominator in order to add the fractions, so let's consider them:

We have x - 3, and we also have 3 - x.

Suppose we rewrote the first denominator as -(3 - x). In other words: x - 3 = -(3 - x)

Our denominators would then be -(3 - x) & (3 - x). Note we haven't changed the value of the denominators, we have simply rewritten them.

The fraction problem would then become:

\displaystyle{\frac{7}{-(3 - x)} + \frac{1}{3 - x}}

Note that when a minus sign is placed in a fraction, it can be placed in either the numberator or the denominator, as it does not matter. So, we can have identical denominators for the purpose of addition by simply moving the minus sign to the numberator in the first fraction:

\displaystyle{\frac{-7}{3 - x} + \frac{1}{3 - x} = \frac{-6}{3 - x}}

My question is, why is this wrong?

The book instead rewrites the OTHER denominator, and the final problem looks like this:

\displaystyle{\frac{7}{x - 3} + \frac{1}{3 - x} = \frac{7}{x - 3} + \frac{1}{-(x - 3)} = \frac{7}{x - 3} + \frac{-1}{x - 3} = \frac{6}{x - 3}}

What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You're answer is the same as the books, but you have written the minus sign on the top, and they have written it on the bottom.
 
DeadWolfe said:
You're answer is the same as the books, but you have written the minus sign on the top, and they have written it on the bottom.

Damn I just realized that...:shy:

Amazing how it helps to look at the whole thing on the screen like that.

Thanks!
 
Also, my answer had a negative term in the fraction, and theirs did not, so I guess theirs is more of the "correct" way, even if the values are in fact the same?
 
It's not "more correct" (not even really sure what that means!) but I personally find it more concise to write answers with the minimum number of symbols, including negative signs. Your answer is fine.
 
Holocene:

Let us prove that:
\frac{-a}{b}=\frac{a}{-b}=-\frac{a}{b}

First off:
\frac{a}{b}+\frac{-a}{b}=a*\frac{1}{b}+(-a)*\frac{1}{b}=(a+(-a))*\frac{1}{b}=0*\frac{1}{b}=0
Hence, we have: \frac{-a}{b}=-\frac{a}{b}, since by

1.definiton of -a/b, we have:
\frac{a}{b}+(-\frac{a}{b})=0
and
2. We may prove that additive inverses are unique.

Furthermore:
\frac{a}{-b}=\frac{1*a}{(-1)*b}=\frac{1}{(-1)}*\frac{a}{b}=(-1)*\frac{a}{b}=-\frac{a}{b}
by employing a few derivable results.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top