Maximize Volume of Right Circular Cone with Constant Slant Edge

AI Thread Summary
To maximize the volume of a right circular cone with a constant slant edge of 6 cm, the relationship between the height and radius must be established. The volume V of the cone can be expressed in terms of the slant edge length x, leading to the formula V = (1/3)πr²h. By applying calculus, the maximum volume occurs when the height is determined to be 4.8 cm, resulting in a maximum volume of approximately 48π cm³. This analysis highlights the geometric relationships and optimization techniques involved in maximizing the volume of a right circular cone.
disfused_3289
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. The slant edge of a right circular cone is 6 cm in length. Find the height of the cone when the volume is a maximum.

2. Find the maximum volume of a right circular cone whose slant edge has a constant length measure a.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would add,
3. Express the volume V(x) of a right circular cone in terms of the length x of its slant edge.

Then solve 3, then 2, then 1.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top