Biology - Frequency of allele problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter v_phoenix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biology Frequency
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating allele frequencies using Hardy-Weinberg's Law based on a sample of 35 individuals, where 19 exhibit hypersensitivity to asparagus, an autosomal dominant trait. The user attempts to determine the frequencies of genotypes AA, Aa, and aa, concluding with a total of 34 instead of 35, leading to confusion about rounding errors in their calculations. Suggestions indicate that rounding 2pq to 5 instead of 6 may be appropriate, but this could result in discrepancies when summing genotypes. The user seeks clarification on whether to maintain the rounded figure and how to proceed with calculating the frequency of the dominant allele. The conversation highlights the importance of careful rounding in genetic calculations to ensure accurate results.
v_phoenix
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've been given this problem involving allelic frequencies and I used the Hardy Weinberg's Law as an attempt to solve it


Homework Statement

In a sample of 35 people, 19 have specific smell hypersensitvity to asparagus. Calculate the frequency of the allele in this sample given that the trait is autosomal dominant.



The attempt at a solution

Here is my working...
I represented the autosomal dominant faulty gene by 'A' and the working copy of the gene by 'a'.

AA = ?
Aa = ?
aa = 16 <<< # genotype (aa): 35-19 = 16
Total 35


I knew that the frequency of non affected recessive individuals = 1/35

Hence q^2 = 1/35... thus q=0.169 (3dp)

Hence p = 1 - 0.169 = 0.831 (3dp)...it then follows p^2 = 0.691 (3dp)

So putting it all together i got... 2pq = 2 * 0.831 * 0.169 = 0.28059



So after that I thought we should multiply these frequencies by the 19 people before to calculate the individual genotype frequencies...

AA = 13 <<< (p^2*19)
Aa = 5 <<< (2pq*19)
aa = 16
Total = 34



But here my total adds up to only 34 people!
I'm not sure if I'm doing it right or I'm missing something...

Please help, any suggestions will be greatly appreciated!
v_phoenix
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked through it carefully to check for errors, but a quick scan looks like you're doing it right. I think your problem in checking your answer at the end (always a good strategy) is due to rounding error.
 
Oh yes, I did check my rounding. But I wasn't too sure when I got 2pq=5.3... if i should keep it at 5 people or round to 6 people??
 
v_phoenix said:
Oh yes, I did check my rounding. But I wasn't too sure when I got 2pq=5.3... if i should keep it at 5 people or round to 6 people??

When I said error, I didn't mean a "mistake," but error in terms of the uncertainty added by rounding. 5.3 would round to 5, but that means you've discarded 0.3. It's not wrong to do that, but means the numbers might not add up perfectly when converted to whole numbers.
 
hmmm... so do you mean i should keep it as 5 people with a genotype of Aa??

Because from there i need to do another step... where I multiply the number of people with the copy of big A allele and divide by the total number of genes in the population.

So if i use 34 people it gives me a result of... ((2*13) + 5) / (2*34) = 31/68
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Back
Top