Which is the correct fundamental period of cot inverse x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter harini_5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Period
AI Thread Summary
The fundamental period of cot inverse x is debated, with S.L. Loney's "TRIGONOMETRY" stating it is from -π/2 to +π/2, while M.L. Khanna's "IIT MATHEMATICS" claims it is from 0 to π. The choice of interval is necessary for defining the inverse of a non one-to-one function and is largely a matter of convention. Both intervals are commonly accepted for tangent functions, leading to confusion regarding which to use in examinations. Ultimately, the selection of the interval may depend on the context or specific guidelines provided in academic settings.
harini_5
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
What is the fundamental period of cot inverse x?
The book, “TRIGONOMETRY “by S.L.Loney says it is –pi/2 to +pi/2 whereas IIT MATHEMATICS by M.L.Khanna says that is 0 to pi
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If f is a non one-to-one function, then, in order to define its "inverse" you must restrict it to an interval on which it is one-to-one. Which such interval you choose is a matter of convention. And for tangent, those are two commonly used conventions.
 
But examination point of view which one to choose?
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Can You Prove the Series Is Periodic?
Replies
33
Views
3K
MHB 7.8.99 find PS, VS Period, graph
Replies
7
Views
1K
MHB -7.8.1 Amp, Period, PS, VS of 3cos(\pi x-2)+5
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Are Inverse Problems More Complex Than Direct Problems in Mathematics?
Replies
13
Views
3K
MHB Equation involving the inverse tangent function
Replies
2
Views
2K
I What are the applications of inverses of vector functions?
Replies
17
Views
3K
The graph of sin inverse (sin x) after the domain of (- pi/2, pi/2)
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Alternating Harmonic Numbers are cool, spread the word!
Replies
4
Views
2K
Relationship between constructibility of reg. polygons and cot(pi/N)
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Inverse Functions vs Inverse Relations
Replies
4
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top