Gravity Probe B and 'frame dragging'

Ian
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
Am I right in assuming that Gravity Probe B has proved that the rotation of the Earth (@~465metres /sec.) 'swirls' space-time in the same sort of way that a rotating ball will swirl a fluid?

I ask because if this is the case, then the forward motion of the Earth (@~360km/sec.) must also produce a linear dragging which is detectable, much like a speedboat leaves a wake in it's path.

Also, if the rotating mass of the Earth causes frame dragging then common sense insists that matter must also 'displace' space time in a manner similar to Archimedes principle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ian,

as far as I lnow after over forty years in the making they are still analysing the data of gravity probe B and we are still waiting for the 2 sigma confidence level results. The frame dragging effect is microscopic and was unfortunately swamped by noise in the data that is something like a hundreds times larger than the signal they are looking for, which is why it is taking so long to analyse.

Not sure about the linear dragging effect.

A good thread monitoring the progress of Gravity Probe B results is here https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=104694&page=20
 
Ian said:
I ask because if this is the case, then the forward motion of the Earth (@~360km/sec.) must also produce a linear dragging which is detectable, much like a speedboat leaves a wake in it's path.
.

Maybe not. I think the Michelson Morley type tests would have detected it. More likely the forward motion of the Earth is orbiting synchronously with a latent frame dragging caused during the origin of the solar system.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top