Question about Grav. Potential Energy and Escape Velocity

AI Thread Summary
To determine the maximum height a rocket reaches when launched vertically from Earth's surface with an initial speed less than escape velocity, gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy must be equated. The initial kinetic energy and potential energy at the Earth's surface should be set equal to the potential energy at the maximum height, where kinetic energy is zero. The conservation of energy equation can be expressed as (1/2)mv0^2 - [G(m)(Mearth)]/r1 = -[G(m)(Mearth)]/r2, where r1 is the Earth's radius and r2 is the maximum height. The final height can then be calculated as r2 - r1. This approach effectively utilizes energy conservation principles to solve the problem.
Divergent13
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I am finding this question to be a bit challenging---

Determine a formula for the maximum height h that a rocket will reach if launched vertically from the Earth's surface with speed Vo. (< Vesc)

(Ignore air resistance and the Earth's rotation)

I know I should plug in numbers only until the end, but by using Gravitational potential energy, is it appropriate to begin with (1/2)m*v1^2 - [G(m)(Mearth)]/r = (1/2)m*v^2 - [G(m)(Mearth)]/r ?

The chapter is quite short --- Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not a physicist or even a scientist, but wouldn't it be merely a matter of 1G deceleration till no momentum is left, and then calculate the distance achieved in that time?

W.A. McCormick
 
You want to use an energy argument.

The object initially has zero potential energy (if you define the PE at the radius of the Earth as zero) and some amount of kinetic energy. When it's at the maximum height, it has zero kinetic energy and some amount of potential energy. Equate and solve.

cookiemonster
 
Divergent13 said:
I know I should plug in numbers only until the end, but by using Gravitational potential energy, is it appropriate to begin with (1/2)m*v1^2 - [G(m)(Mearth)]/r = (1/2)m*v^2 - [G(m)(Mearth)]/r ?
Yes, that's essentially it. But set it up carefully as a statement of energy conservation. KE1 + PE1 = KE2 + PE2. Of course, maximum height means that KE2 = 0.

\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 - \frac{GmM_e}{r_1} = - \frac{GmM_e}{r_2}<br />

The height will be r_2 - r_1; r_1 = radius of Earth.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top