Atomic Bonding in Metals: Kinetic & Potential Energy

number4
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When individual atoms bond to form a metal lattice, the total energy decreases, but does the kinetic energy of the electrons increase or decrease? What about the potential energy? Does it increase due to pauli exclusion or decrease due to the decrease in distance between the ion and electron? Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinetic energy goes up when atoms bond. If you think of it from a tight-binding perspective, as atoms move closer together the overlap of the electron's wavefunctions increase, which increases the ability for the electrons to hop from one atom to another.

Potential energy will both increase due to Pauli exclusion and decrease due to the decreasing the ion-electron distance. When going from isolated atoms to bonded atoms, the ionic attraction wins over Pauli exclusion. But if you increase pressure and compress the system, then the increasing kinetic energy and exclusion principle will increase the total energy more the electrostatic potential will decrease it.
 
kanato said:
But if you increase pressure and compress the system, then the increasing kinetic energy and exclusion principle will increase the total energy more the electrostatic potential will decrease it.

This part doesn't seem right. If the energy is higher in the bonded state than the unbonded state due to increased pressure, then the metal will turn into a gas. Can you give an example of this happening?

Increasing the pressure should favor the formation of solid bonds, rather than the reverse. That is, the decrease in electrostatic potential energy should always win out.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top