Vertical Testing: 420lbs vs 350lbs Dropped 5 Feet

  • Thread starter Thread starter normanwood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Testing Vertical
AI Thread Summary
To determine the drop height needed for a 420-pound weight to exert the same force as a 350-pound weight dropped from 5 feet, additional information is required, particularly regarding deceleration factors. Key variables include the elasticity of the harness, the supporting ropes, and the potential deformation of the human body upon impact. Accurate calculations may be challenging and often rely on experimental data gathered from accelerometers in mannequins or cadavers. If both weights use identical harnesses and cables, a rough estimate could be possible. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for safety in harness testing.
normanwood
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am going to test a full body harness. I need to know how far a 420 pound weight needs to drop to exert the same force as a 350 pound weight dropped 5 feet.

Thank You

Norm Wood
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF

You can't do that kind of calculation without much more information. The force arises from the deceleration, so what is just as important as height is the things that affect the deceleration, like the elasticity of the harness, supporting ropes, and deformation of the human body. Since some of these are pretty difficult to figure out mathematically, I suspect they are done experimentally with accelerometers in manequens or cadavers.
 
If both manequens used the exact same harness and the same steel cable was used to stop the descent. Can you come up with a ball park fiqure.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top