How many forum members does it take to change a light bulb?

Click For Summary
The discussion humorously explores the question of how many forum members it takes to change a light bulb, illustrating the typical dynamics of online forums. It highlights various roles members might take, such as changing the bulb, sharing experiences, cautioning about dangers, and debating terminology. The conversation includes arguments over the correct spelling of "light bulb," with some insisting on "lamp" as the proper term. Members also engage in tangents about the relevance of the topic to the forum, with debates on the best methods and brands for light bulbs, as well as links to external resources. The thread reflects the chaotic and often humorous nature of online discussions, where a simple question can lead to extensive, off-topic exchanges, showcasing the culture of internet forums.
skywise
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Q:
How many forum members does it takes to change a light bulb?

A:
* 1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed

* 14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently

* 7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs

* 1 to move it to the Lighting section

* 2 to argue then move it to the Electricals section

* 7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs

* 5 to flame the spell checkers

* 3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

* 6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

* 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp"

* 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct

* 19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb forum

* 11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

* 36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty

* 7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs

* 4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

* 3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group

* 13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"

* 5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy

* 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

* 13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs"

* 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:biggrin: lol, I hope you didn't post it out of frustration
 
Nope, it's an old joke from years ago. As true now as it was when it was conceived.

It doesn't hold true on most forums due to a lack of members, but it certainly holds true on Anandtech.
 
I call the forum lurker position!
 
Skywise, that's hysterical! :biggrin:
 
This is a physics forum, and not a lightbulb (light bulb) forum. Please move it to the appropriate forum (or the lighting section). :biggrin:
 
motai said:
This is a physics forum, and not a lightbulb (light bulb) forum. Please move it to the appropriate forum (or the lighting section). :biggrin:
Lightbulbs may only be changed from the electrical engineering section of the forums and under the supervision of an engineering mentor.
 
lol, very funny. Its like a physicsforums horoscope. Skywise, you forgot to mention someone who would argue about the exact definition of a light bulb vs. lightbulb vs.lamp.
 
Darn it, you stole my cue. :frown:
 
  • #10
The notion that a light bulb can be "changed" (changed into what?) is tantamount either to alchemy or magic, and belongs either in Theory Development or Skepticism and Debunking. Either way, there is no number of PF members who will be able to accomplish such a "change".
 
  • #11
Since a light bulb is the common symbol for an idea, it can be changed by changing one's mind. How many PF posters do that?
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #12
Perhaps the "change" is within the person. If that is the case, then it belongs in the Metaphysics and Epistemology forum.
 
  • #13
This project is going nowhere, it requires an Environmental Impact Report.
 
  • #14
the high efficiency of an LED/fiber optic combination negates the need for a wasteful, heat generating "light bulb"

I invented a solar powered light bulb.
 
  • #15
motai said:
Perhaps the "change" is within the person. If that is the case, then it belongs in the Metaphysics and Epistemology forum.

You are implying a faulty Cartesian Theater model here. Daniel Dennett has clearly shown that the mind is nothing above and beyond the brain. Therefore any posts regarding the changing of light bulbs involves the changing of one's systematic pattern of neural activation in the frontal and inferior temporal lobes, and thus any posts on the matter belong in the Biology forum.
 
  • #16
wow...just wow
 
  • #17
Skywise, that's just a riot! :biggrin:
 
  • #18
wwow is right. I'm happy to see this was so thoroughly enjoyed. :approve:
 
  • #19
Let's not forget the 932 crackpots who will argue till the end that everything being taught in schools about lightbulbs is false, and the last and only Bastion of Truth of All Things Lightbulbical is to be found on their personal geocities website, because the referees of establishment lightbulb research journals keep supressing their obviously true ideas.
 
  • #20
Well, since JimmyP has been sleeping on the job, I'll take over the role of the former lurker who resurrects the thread. See, this is what happens when someone creates a "best of" thread and brings these funny ones to the attention of former lurkers :wink:

Oh, and since we're also missing links to sites with pictures of light bulbs, I felt I needed to help with that too :smile:

http://www.bulbcollector.com/light_bulb.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
You all fail to realize the truth, there is no "bulb", only "light".

For this, you all face eternal torment from being touced by hot "bulbs" that you so erroneously believe in. Heathens.

Ps: And if it weren't for your "bulb" establishment suppressing my oblviously true ideas, i wouldn't ahve had to bring this up in mixed company...



...Heathens.
 
  • #22
You have all gone mad.

Nice work Skywise. :biggrin:

The Bob (2004 ©)

P.S. This should be in the 'I don't know where this thread should go' section. :shy:
 
  • #23
Moonbear said:
Well, since JimmyP has been sleeping on the job, I'll take over the role of the former lurker who resurrects the thread. See, this is what happens when someone creates a "best of" thread and brings these funny ones to the attention of former lurkers :wink:

Oh, and since we're also missing links to sites with pictures of light bulbs, I felt I needed to help with that too :smile:

http://www.bulbcollector.com/light_bulb.html

I think one has to consider the biased opinion spouted by this website before deciding how much credence to give it.

In the pre-1900 section, there were 4 Buckeye bulbs and not a single Cornhusker bulb?! Give me a break. At least the Buckeye lamps all received a rating of 0.00 - (Now watch Gokul go and rectify that :smile: )

By the way, the Aerolux Cosmos lamp in the neon glow lights is pretty cool - well deserving of its 9.50 rating.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
BobG said:
I think one has to consider the biased opinion spouted by this website before deciding how much credence to give it.

What evidence do you have that they are biased? Just because they don't support your opinions on light bulbs doesn't automatically mean they are biased. This is a reputable light bulb site, not one of your crackpot sites arguing the existence of Cornhusker bulbs. :smile: :biggrin:
 
  • #25
BobG said:
I think one has to consider the biased opinion spouted by this website before deciding how much credence to give it.

In the pre-1900 section, there were 4 Buckeye bulbs and not a single Cornhusker bulb?! Give me a break. At least the Buckeye lamps all received a rating of 0.00 - (Now watch Gokul go and rectify that :smile: )

By the way, the Aerolux Cosmos lamp in the neon glow lights is pretty cool - well deserving of its 9.50 rating.

Funny ! I've heard the husker bulbs were stuck in the dark ages until some westerner came by to enlighten them.
 
  • #26
Moonbear said:
What evidence do you have that they are biased? Just because they don't support your opinions on light bulbs doesn't automatically mean they are biased. This is a reputable light bulb site, not one of your crackpot sites arguing the existence of Cornhusker bulbs. :smile: :biggrin:

I take all the bad things I said about them back.

What a cool site. If you go back to the home page, they have a section for old radio vacuum tubes, X-ray tubes, and so on.

They even have their own forum. A priceless discussion: http://www.bulbcollector.com/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000415.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #27
BobG said:
I take all the bad things I said about them back.

What a cool site. If you go back to the home page, they have a section for old radio vacuum tubes, X-ray tubes, and so on.

They even have their own forum. A priceless discussion: http://www.bulbcollector.com/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000415.html

Hey, that discussion is priceless ! Especially the picture with the little black arrow...that's something, eh !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #28
BobG said:
I take all the bad things I said about them back.

What a cool site. If you go back to the home page, they have a section for old radio vacuum tubes, X-ray tubes, and so on.

They even have their own forum. A priceless discussion: http://www.bulbcollector.com/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000415.html

Oh, geez, I'm sorry guys, I didn't foresee the danger of introducing a slide rule collector to a light bulb collecting site. :bugeye: I'll have to be more careful in the future about introducing PFers to dangerous habits. :smile:

That discussion forum borders on frightening! This gives me an idea (now I need a light bulb icon!)...the way to solve the problem of over-full landfills. It's not about just convincing people to recycle, we have to tap into these kooky collectors and just start convincing them they need to broaden their collection. Before long, they'll be fishing almost everything out of the trash, and storing it in their basements. It's not a permanent solution, eventually they'll run out of basement space, but it might buy some time while they pre-sort everything for us as we find ways to recycle it for better uses. :smile:

I'm glad that link amuses you. It's certainly better than the bizarre graphics on the first light bulb site I googled...unless they meant headlights :wink: , I don't know how those pictures related to light bulbs. :eek:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #29
Stay On Topic!

I think the last few posters have been getting off topic, this is a discussion about how many forumers it takes to screw in a light bulb, please stick to the topic.

P.S. Existence is spelled with two Es, no A!
 
Last edited:
  • #30
Smurf, if you're going to pick on spelling, then at least get your grammar correct. "Forumers"...puhleeeze! Now we're inventing words. :smile:

And we're not off-topic. How can we discuss how many forum members it takes to change a light bulb unless we've clearly defined what a light bulb is, where to find them, which type we are talking about, is it better than other types available, etc? Afterall, the methods used for changing a light bulb will depend on the type of light bulb involved. You obviously haven't take enough light bulb classes to fully understand this question if you don't see how many options there are in light bulbs. Please go back to your Light Bulb courses before you tell the Light Bulb experts how to address the question properly. :wink:

(P.S.-Thanks, we needed a spelling policeman and a topic reminder...glad you stepped up to the plate.) :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

Hmm...how does this affect the count, when some of us are taking on multiple roles...the same person complaining about spelling and reminding us to stay on topic? We'll have to take a more accurate count at the end of the thread. :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
37K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K