Total and dihedral energies ffrom MD simulations

jspock
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
I hope you can give me any idea about:

After a long molecular dynamic simulation of a polymer under periodic boundary conditions, dihedral and total energies are lower than zero, (negative). do you know the physical meaning of that result?

thanks for reading and for your help

jspock
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Since nobody else has responded yet, I'll go ahead and hazard a simple guess--though I have very little experience with MD simulations myself.

Is it as simple as the total kinetic energy is not enough to overcome the (negative) potential energy of the various bonds and/or attractions among the particles?

Sorry if you've thought of that and ruled it out, as I have no idea of your background or experience.
 
Thanks Redbelly, you are right but after your comments and some more reading I found out a best answer:

energy on MD simulations, depends very much on which force field you use, and the particular form they use for the dihedral term; many use periodic terms, including several terms for one dihedral; i.e.

U = K*(1 + n*cos(PHI - PHIeq))

so depending on, it is possible to easily get negative dihedral energies.

Total energies are usually negative, because it means that the system is favorable (the lower the better).


thanks

javier
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top