What Happens in the Reverse Twins Paradox with Accelerated Motion?

Austin0
Messages
1,160
Reaction score
1
Reverse Twins paradox ?

This may have come up before but I haven't seen it and don't know the answer.

What if the twins started out in two ships moving together at relativistically significant velocity relative to earth. One of the twins then simply goes to Earth and back while the other maintains unform motion.

In this situation who ends up older?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Austin0 said:
This may have come up before but I haven't seen it and don't know the answer.

What if the twins started out in two ships moving together at relativistically significant velocity relative to earth. One of the twins then simply goes to Earth and back while the other maintains unform motion.

In this situation who ends up older?
The one that changed direction and accelerated four times.
 
Last edited:


for the worldlines of two observers who meet up at two different events, the one which has a longer Euclidean length between these two events, will have a shorter Lorentzian length, thereby a shorter proper time and consequently the corresponding observer remains younger. draw a diagram.
 


MeJennifer said:
The one that changed direction and accelerated four times.
Oops, I mean to say that the one that changed direction and accelerated four times is the younger not the older one. My apologies.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...

Similar threads

Back
Top