Angular Misalignment Requirement: Vector Sum of N deg - Brian

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcarlson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a technical requirement for angular misalignment in a project, specifically addressing the vector sum of angular misalignments about the X and Y axes. The requirement states that the total angular misalignment must be less than a specified value, N, and is mathematically represented as the square root of the sum of the squares of the individual angles. Participants confirm that the interpretation aligns with the mathematical expression provided. Additionally, the requirement includes a tolerance of 3.0 degrees for angular misalignment about the Z axis. Overall, clarity on the requirement's implications is sought for accurate project execution.
bcarlson
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have document that list different technical requirements on a project I'm working on.

One requirement is on initial angular misalignment.

It states:

Vector sum of N deg about X and Y axes.

Does this simply mean that the:

sqrt(Theta_X^2 + Theta_Y^2) = Theta_Total < N

Or is there something more complex going on here?

Thanks in advance.

Brian
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Vector sum of N deg about X and Y axes.

This looks like an incomplete sentence. Could you elaborate?
 
Its an excerpt from a table of requirements. The entire table entry for relative "Angular Missalignment" between two frames A and B consists of the two following requirements.

1.) They allow 3.0 degrees of angular missalignment about the Z axis.

2.) The also require that the vector sum of the individual missalignments on the X and Y axes be limited to 3.0 degrees.

Thanks,

Brian
 
sqrt(Theta_X^2 + Theta_Y^2) = Theta_Total < N
My interpretation of what the requirement means is the same as yours.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top