How is the Number of Quantum States Derived for Combined Einstein Solids?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the number of quantum states for two combined Einstein solids that can exchange energy. The formula for the number of states is expressed as g(n,N) = ∑ g(N_A,n_A)g(N_B,n-n_A), where n is the total quantum number and n_A and n_B represent the quantum numbers of each solid. The key insight is that bringing the two systems into thermal contact allows for energy exchange, necessitating a summation over all possible discrete energy arrangements. An example illustrates how energy redistribution leads to new configurations, confirming the formula's validity. Understanding this derivation is crucial for analyzing the thermodynamic behavior of combined systems.
loonychune
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Two Einstein solids are joined so that they can exchange energy. One contains N_A oscillators, the other N_B oscillators. Apparently, the possible number of quantum states of the combined system is given by,

g(n,N) = \sum_{n_A = 0}^n g(N_A,n_A)g(N_B,n-n_A)

where n is the principal quantum number of the composite solid

n = n_A + n_B

Now, I cannot see where this comes from. I hope this formula looks familiar more than anything, though I will look to write up everything I see here contained in the notes if necessary. Can anyone help?

Thanks,


Damian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I see it now.

Bringing the two systems into thermal contact means they can exchange energy, so we have to sum over all the possible discrete energies.

e.g.

n_A = 3, n_B = 4 \rightarrow n_{A,NEW} = 0, n_{B,NEW} = 7

is a new possible arrangement.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top