Can sunlight cause electrons to be emitted from a metal surface?

AI Thread Summary
Electrons can indeed be released from a metal surface when exposed to sunlight due to the photoelectric effect. However, this process has limitations. As electrons escape, the metal becomes positively charged, making it increasingly difficult for subsequent electrons to leave due to electrostatic attraction. Eventually, the emission of electrons will cease as the charge builds up. The current generated from this effect is extremely small, making it difficult to detect, even though millions of electrons may be emitted per second. An example of this phenomenon can be observed with zinc, where exposure to sunlight can accelerate the loss of charge, but visual evidence of radiation is not apparent.
expscv
Messages
241
Reaction score
0
it state electron will be released from a metal surface if exposed to electromagnetic


so i was thinking on a sunny day, a particular metal exposed to sun light one of the emf,, would the electron start to fly off the surface?

if it does,? isn't this radiation? or it is un-notice-able?

thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
expscv said:
it state electron will be released from a metal surface if exposed to electromagnetic


so i was thinking on a sunny day, a particular metal exposed to sun light one of the emf,, would the electron start to fly off the surface?

if it does,? isn't this radiation? or it is un-notice-able?

thx

"one of the emf..."" no sense.

I'm guessing what you are asking, is does the photoelectric effect cause electrons to spray off of a metal if it is left out on a sunny day?

Yes and no.

THe photoelectric effect would indeed cause electrons to receive the energy required to "escape" the piece of metal, but once the electron leaves, then the metal will have a net positive charge, and the electron will of course be negatively charged. THe next electron would have to receive even more energy to escape the metal that is now already positively charged, the third electron even more, etc etc. So after a very short while there will no longer be any electrons emitted because there would be too much electrostatic attraction for an electron to overcome (I don't know how many electrons, thousands? millions?) and the effect would stop.

It would be hard to detect this current, since even millions of electrons flowing per second is only one trillionth of an amp. One way to see evidence of this effect is to expose zinc that has been negatively charged to direct sunlight. Using an electroscope you can see the charge leaks off the zinc much faster than without sunlight. Evidently, a strong UV lamp can cause the zinc to show a positive charge after it loses lots of photoelectrons (you need a sesitive electroscope, I never got this to work)

No matter what, you would not SEE any visual effect of radiation of any sort.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top