Is Your Home Contaminated with Corrosive Chinese Drywall?

  • Thread starter Thread starter edward
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    China
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights concerns regarding toxic Chinese drywall, which contains sulfur compounds and was primarily used in homes built after 2000. Homeowners experiencing issues such as blackened electrical wires, respiratory problems, and unpleasant odors may be affected by this drywall, which was first noted in regions like Florida and California but has since been found more widely distributed. Class action lawsuits are underway as homeowners seek recourse against builders who purchased the drywall, often without awareness of its harmful effects. The only effective solution is to remove and replace the drywall entirely. The conversation also touches on the legal challenges homeowners face, including a limited statute of limitations for contract claims in the U.S., and the lack of robust protections for buyers. Additionally, it notes that many builders subcontract various stages of construction, complicating accountability for material quality.
edward
Messages
62
Reaction score
167
They got us again. The drywall contains sulfur or sulfur compounds.

If a homeowner purchased a new home, or condominium after 2000, has blackened, or charred electrical wires inside an interior electrical receptacle, there is a good chance they have the imported toxic Chinese drywall. The product was first introduced to the US in late 2000 or early 2001 and was primarily used in new US subdivisions, condominiums or home remodeling jobs.

Homeowners could suffer from severe respiratory issues, headaches and nosebleeds. Homes may have a sulphur (rotten eggs) type of smell and air conditioning coils, stove top oven elements and refrigerators may fail at an excessively high rate.

http://www.constructiondigital.com/MarketSector/Construction-Equipment-and-Materials/Report--Use-of-toxic-Chinese-drywall-rampant_18759.aspx

Originally reported as being used primarily in Florida and California, this link indicates more widespread distribution.

There are a number of class action law suits filed by owners and builders.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If one buys cheap/inexpensive, low quality imports, one is at risk.

Buy domestically produced goods from companies that adhere to quality standards (ASTM).
 
"You get what you pay for"
 
This wasn't a case of individuals making a bad choice on a product purchase.

It was the home builders who were buying it. The new home buyers got stuck with it.

The only way to solve the problem is to rip out all of the drywall and replace it. Buyers are suing builders and the builders are trying to sue the Chinese companies who manufactured the dry wall. No one really knows how extensive the problem is.

Florida due to it's high humidity noticed the problem first.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kHq_H3l7aE&feature=PlayList&p=EAE83B4A1C44AB22&index=0&playnext=1
 
edward said:
This wasn't a case of individuals making a bad choice on a product purchase.

It was the home builders who were buying it. The new home buyers got stuck with it.

The only way to solve the problem is to rip out all of the drywall and replace it. Buyers are suing builders and the builders are trying to sue the Chinese companies who manufactured the dry wall. No one really knows how extensive the problem is.

Florida due to it's high humidity noticed the problem first.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kHq_H3l7aE&feature=PlayList&p=EAE83B4A1C44AB22&index=0&playnext=1
For the home builders, IMO unless there has been a breach of building regulations governing the composition of dry wall or the Chinese manufacturers did not provide materials to the home builders specs then I'd think this will simply fall into the category of Caveat Emptor (let the buyer beware).

The home owner may have recourse against the home builder but in the US the statute of limitations for contract law is a maximum of 4 years. This is from when the breach happened, ie delivery, not from when the breach was found. In some parts of Europe this warranty is extended to 10 years in the case of property purchases. I don't know if the US makes similar exceptions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm a bit surprised it's profitable to import drywall.
You'd think that for such a cheap product which is comparatively bulky, the transport costs would add significant overhead.
 
Art said:
For the home builders, IMO unless there has been a breach of building regulations governing the composition of dry wall or the Chinese manufacturers did not provide materials to the home builders specs then I'd think this will simply fall into the category of Caveat Emptor (let the buyer beware).

The home owner may have recourse against the home builder but in the US the statute of limitations for contract law is a maximum of 4 years. This is from when the breach happened, ie delivery, not from when the breach was found. In some parts of Europe this warranty is extended to 10 years in the case of property purchases. I don't know if the US makes similar exceptions.

The U.S has very poor protection for home buyers.

Some of the big home builders don't even buy the materials that go into a new home, nor do they have construction workers. They subcontract everything out. A concrete company pours the slab, a framing company builds the structure, then another company applies the siding or stucco.

Next the roofers, electricians ,drywall , flooring, plumbers, and AC contractors arrive in sequence. The builder just coordinates the subs. Each sub buys his materials from a wholesaler.
 
Last edited:

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top