True, false questions about matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter lukaszh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around true or false questions regarding matrices, specifically focusing on properties of Hermitian and diagonalizable matrices. The first question addresses whether Hermitian matrix A implies that matrices B and C are anti-symmetric, concluding that this statement is false since B is symmetric and C is anti-symmetric. The second question discusses diagonalizable matrices and claims that if a matrix is diagonalizable, it must have n different eigenvalues, which is confirmed as true. However, a participant challenges this assertion by pointing out that diagonalizable matrices can have repeated eigenvalues, emphasizing that diagonalizability is tied to having n independent eigenvectors, not distinct eigenvalues. The conversation highlights the nuances of matrix properties and their implications in linear algebra.
lukaszh
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,
could you help me with some true false questions about matrices?

First
If \mathbf{A}=\mathbf{B}-\mathrm{i}\mathbf{C} is hermitian matrix \mathbf{B},\mathbf{C} are real, then \mathbf{B},\mathbf{C} are anti-symmetric matrices. True? False?

My solution
If \mathbf{A} is hermitian, then \mathbf{A}^{\mathrm{H}}=\mathbf{A} so (\mathbf{B}-\mathrm{i}\mathbf{C})^{\mathrm{H}}=\mathbf{B}^{\mathrm{H}}-(\mathrm{i}\mathbf{C})^{\mathrm{H}}=\mathbf{B}^{\mathrm{T}}+i\mathbf{C}^{\mathrm{T}}. It implies the fact \mathbf{B}^{\mathrm{T}}+i\mathbf{C}^{\mathrm{T}}=\mathbf{B}-\mathrm{i}\mathbf{C}. \mathbf{B} is symmetric and \mathbf{C} is anti-symmetric. FALSE

Second
If A is diagonalizable and its eigenvalues are \{\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\cdots,\lambda_n\}, then \prod_{k=1}^{n}(x-\lambda_k)=0 has n different solutions

My solution
Matrix is diagonalizable, then \lambda_i\ne\lambda_j for i\ne j. So polynomial has n different soln's. TRUE


Thank you very much for your help...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have a much bigger problem that whether this statement is true of false! What makes you think that if a matrix is diagonalizable, then \lambda_i\ne\lambda_j?

The identity matrix is diagonalizable because it is diagonal. What are its eigenvalues?

(An n by n matrix is diagonalizable if and only if it has n independent eigenvectors. It doesn't matter what the eigenvalues are.)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top