Time of sunset using Radius of earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time until the Sun fully disappears after a person rises from lying down on the beach. The participants debate the correct approach to the problem, particularly the use of trigonometric functions to determine the angle of the Earth's curvature. One user suggests using the arccosine function to find the angle, leading to a calculated time of approximately 9.41 seconds. Another contributor points out that the assumption of the Sun's motion across the sky may not accurately reflect its altitude change, suggesting that the calculated time might be a minimum estimate. The conversation highlights the complexities of the problem and the need for careful consideration of the Earth's movement and the Sun's trajectory.
George3
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
URGENT Time of sunset using Radius of earth

Homework Statement



The Sun sets, fully disappearing over the horizon as you lie on the beach, your eyes 20 cm above the sand. You immediately jump up, your eyes now 170 cm above the sand, and you can again see the top of the Sun. If you count the number of seconds ( = t) until the Sun fully disappears again, you can estimate the radius of the Earth. Use the known radius of the Earth to calculate the time t.

2 sig figs

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


radius = 6400m
radius + height = 6400.015
cos(R/(R + h)) = .54 radians
(time/ 1 day) = radians/ 2pi
time = ? I don't think I am doing this right because I am getting like 73000 seconds with this method.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi George3! :smile:
George3 said:
radius = 6400m

Small world! :wink:
 
I meant km
 
What is 6400 km + 150 cm?

Edit
Why are you taking the cosine of R/(r+h)?
 
Last edited:
I was taking the cosine of(R/R+h) to find the angle that the Earth moved. Do you have any idea how to tackle this problem?
 
Drawing a picture is often a good start.

Since you are taking the cosine of R/(R+h), it must represent some angle. What is it? (Hint: There is no such angle.)
 
I drew a picture, the line of sight when you are lying down is tangent to the Earth's surface. This would make a right angle with the radius of the earth. Where am I going wrong?
 
R/(R+h) is the ratio of two sides of your triangle. It is not an angle. So why are you taking the cosine of this ratio? You are on the right track but you are using the wrong function.
 
For this problem I did this:
arccos(6400000m/6400001.5m) = .00021radians
.00068radians = .039degrees
.039degrees / 360degrees * 86400secs = 9.41secs
Is this right?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Much better.
 
  • #11
This is an online assignment and I only have one more chance to get it right. Should I turn this in or keep working?
 
  • #12
George3 said:
This is an online assignment and I only have one more chance to get it right. Should I turn this in or keep working?

Wait. I don't know how strict your assignment's requirements are, because I haven't seen it, but there's one thing you haven't considered.

You've been assuming that the Sun moves across the sky at 360 degrees per 24 hours, which is (at least approximately) correct, but does it lose altitude at that rate? Think about the Sun's motion: it rises near the east but not exactly due east, arcs its way towards the north or south and reaches due north/south at solar noon, and sets in the west. It doesn't rise in the east and plop right down in the west, so there's a horizontal component of its motion.

You've calculated the minimum possible value of "t". At the poles, where the Sun doesn't set for six months, "t" is on the order of hours or days. If the Earth didn't revolve around the Sun, "t" would be infinite.
 
  • #13
I highly doubt we need to take into consideration of the differences in altitude (just as we prob. don't have to account for the fact that atmosphere bends the light, etc). My attempt at this problem is similar, but with law of sine. And honestly, I can't get this problem either (also at one attempt left).

Lol.

I'll see.
 
Back
Top