What Does Mathematics Research Really Involve?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of research in mathematics, exploring what it involves beyond the theoretical aspects. Participants express curiosity about the practicalities of mathematical research, including the tools used and the process of problem-solving.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the research process as starting with a mathematical toolkit and applying it to problems, often leading to the need for new tools.
  • Participants mention the importance of reading literature, attending conferences, and collaborating with others to develop new ideas and tools.
  • There is a focus on the iterative nature of research, where ideas are tested and refined, and not all attempts lead to successful outcomes.
  • Another participant raises questions about the practical aspects of research, such as the tools used (blackboard, paper, computer) and the workings of grants and funding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the exploratory and iterative nature of mathematical research, but there are varying perspectives on the specific tools and processes involved. Questions regarding grants and funding remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of mathematical problems and the research environment are not explicitly stated, and the discussion does not delve into specific examples of research projects.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in pursuing mathematics research or those curious about the practical aspects of working in the field of mathematics.

DarrenM
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
Hello there,

Would someone be so kind as to elaborate on what research in the field of mathematics entails? Not necessarily what is being researched, as I've found quite a bit of that on my own; to be frank, most of it is currently over my head.

Rather, (this is going to sound a bit silly) "research" conjures up images of laboratories and humming machines and 'experiments.' I know that is a misconception, but I'm quite curious as to what the reality is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a deceptively hard question. I've studied as a pure mathematician, and I find it hard to tell you what I did.
The way I see it is when you start researching mathematics you've got a mathematical toolkit of all the ideas and techniques you've learned so far (you linear algebra, your calculus, etc.).
Then you look at a problem mathematics can be applied to - good problems often come from understanding mathematics itself. An example might be: I know a formula to solve linear equations and quadratics; how can I find one to solve cubics? Quartics? Quintics? (and this turns out to be a very rich question).
You then think about how to use your mathematical toolbox to solve these problems. Nearly always you'll get stuck somewhere, so you need new tools.

For new ideas we read books, articles and journals, we go to conferences, we correspond with other mathematicians. The tool we need might already be developed, or we might need to invent it ourself, or extend another tool.

This is the hardest bit - you have to guess what tool you need. Often you just try different things with varying amounts of success.

When you have an idea you work it through, on a computer or a whiteboard or in your head on the bus. If it works you pat yourself on the back and feel good. If it doesn't you try something else.

(You might design a new tool that doesn't solve your problem, but you still think it's pretty nifty. You might go and try to find problems that you can use your tool to solve.)

That's as close as I can think of a description without going into a specific example.
 
fantispug said:
That's a deceptively hard question. I've studied as a pure mathematician, and I find it hard to tell you what I did.
The way I see it is when you start researching mathematics you've got a mathematical toolkit of all the ideas and techniques you've learned so far (you linear algebra, your calculus, etc.).
Then you look at a problem mathematics can be applied to - good problems often come from understanding mathematics itself. An example might be: I know a formula to solve linear equations and quadratics; how can I find one to solve cubics? Quartics? Quintics? (and this turns out to be a very rich question).
You then think about how to use your mathematical toolbox to solve these problems. Nearly always you'll get stuck somewhere, so you need new tools.

For new ideas we read books, articles and journals, we go to conferences, we correspond with other mathematicians. The tool we need might already be developed, or we might need to invent it ourself, or extend another tool.

This is the hardest bit - you have to guess what tool you need. Often you just try different things with varying amounts of success.

When you have an idea you work it through, on a computer or a whiteboard or in your head on the bus. If it works you pat yourself on the back and feel good. If it doesn't you try something else.

(You might design a new tool that doesn't solve your problem, but you still think it's pretty nifty. You might go and try to find problems that you can use your tool to solve.)

That's as close as I can think of a description without going into a specific example.

This is one of the best descriptions I've ever heard so far, in this forum, as long as math research goes!
 
I've been wondering about two things regarding mathematics research:

1. What do most mathematicians use when they're working? Blackboard, paper, computer?

2. How do grants work in regards to this? I would ask a more specific question, but I'm very fuzzy on grants and funding in general.
 
Thanks, Darren, for asking this question. It is something that I have wondered about for a long time. And thanks, too, fantispug for a great answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K