Is Aeronautics the Future for Aspiring Astrophysicists?

AI Thread Summary
Aeronautics and Astrophysics are seen as appealing specializations for aspiring astrophysicists, with a strong interest in quantum physics and electronics also noted. The desire to specialize early is expressed, despite the understanding of the importance of a general physics education. The discussion highlights a concern about the potential dangers of neglecting quantum physics studies. Additionally, the act of building in electronics is mentioned as a motivating factor for pursuing that field. Overall, there is a clear enthusiasm for aeronautics as a future path in the context of astrophysics.
vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
In 2010 I will be doing my third year,

Aeronautics and Astrophysics seems to be calling to me,
the only other specialization of interest is quantum physics and maybe electronics,

I know I shouldn't really abandon a more general physics education, but I really want to start specializing now!

I remember reading in one of my Quantum physics books how dangerous it would be for the human race to stop studying Quantum physics and that is the reason why I still take papers that involve it,

and I only do electronics papers because it involves building things,

does anyone else feel the need to do Aeronautics?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc
video related
please watch it,
 
Space news on Phys.org


Oh Carl!

He is THE reason I ended up doing astrophysics. Unfortunately, I never finished the "astro" part.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top