Reciprocal of a cubic function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of a cubic function having a reciprocal without vertical asymptotes. It concludes that if a reciprocal lacks vertical asymptotes, the cubic function must have no roots, which is impossible. Therefore, all reciprocal functions derived from cubic functions will inherently have vertical asymptotes. This aligns with the mathematical properties of cubic functions and their reciprocals. Ultimately, no cubic function can exist without roots that would prevent vertical asymptotes in its reciprocal.
staka
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to have the reciprocal of a cubic function that does not have any vertical asymptotes?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If the reciprocal has no vertical asymptotes, then the cubic function would have no roots. No such cubic exists.
 
Yeah.. thought so. I guess for all reciprocal functions, there will always be a vertical asymptote.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top