Lyman alpha forest different for different objects?

AI Thread Summary
The distribution of Lyman alpha absorbers in quasar spectra varies with redshift, indicating an evolutionary trend in the universe. Research suggests that the frequency of these absorbers follows a power law, but the constants differ among various astronomical objects. This discrepancy raises questions about the expected uniformity of absorber distribution across different directions in the universe. The user seeks recent references on this topic, noting a scarcity of studies post-2001. Understanding these variations is crucial for interpreting cosmic structures and their evolution.
Jonathan Scott
Gold Member
Messages
2,345
Reaction score
1,185
I was wondering how the distribution of Lyman alpha absorbers (as seen in the "forest" of absorption lines of a quasar spectrum) varies with red-shift (corresponding to evolution with the age of the universe). I've found various sources which mention in passing that the frequency of absorbers in a given spectrum vary with redshift according to a power law, which sounds interesting.

But it seems that the constants involved and hence the redshift distribution of absorption systems varies for different objects. Is that really right, and if so how can that be? I had expected that the average number of clouds between two given redshift values would be about the same in all directions, so all objects should show similar distributions.

Can anyone point me to a recent reference on this? Most of the papers I can find are around 1997-2001.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top