Does the smallest unit of matter possess depth or space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter loopianoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Unit
loopianoo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does the smallest unit of matter have depth, or any quantity of space? My theory is that if a unit has space, it can still be divided in half. So what is the smallest unit of matter, one that cannot be divided in half?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you heard of atoms?...
 
Elementary particles, according to standard QM are point-like objects (with no spatial displacement), and according to string theory are string-like objects (1-D strings, weird stuff...).
 
As noted above, in the standard model of particle physics, particles are modeled as idealized point like objects without size.

My theory is that if a unit has space, it can still be divided in half.

This could possibly be true if space is really continuous as assumed in relativity...however such an assumption leads to infinites, divergences (inconsistences) between relativity and quantum mechanics...so we know something is not quite right with this idea as currently formulated.

You can read about Planck scale physics: you will find that below some minimum length/area/or volume, such as about 10-33 cm length, things cannot be further divided because quantum froth (uncertainty) may take hold...everything becomes jumbled in energetic undulations... time/space/matter as we know it becomes quantum foam...and these distinct entities as we know them on large scales become energetic uncertainties...akin, perhaps, to Heisenberg uncertainty...

An analogy to this minimum size at Planck scale in string theory is called "T duality" where, as a string radius is decreased in one model, it is the same as increasing the radius in another string model...so again there appears to be some minimums which nature may dictate.

But there is no absolute incontavertible experimental proof to any of the above explanations.
 
loopianoo said:
Does the smallest unit of matter have depth, or any quantity of space? My theory is that if a unit has space, it can still be divided in half. So what is the smallest unit of matter, one that cannot be divided in half?
Atoms are the best smallest parts of matter, especially those of noble gases.

Each division takes some energy. When you divide many noble gas atoms in groups, it takes little energy. As soon as you try to divide a single atom in parts, it takes much more energy. And the divided parts - charges - are very sticky. If not allowed to recombine in a neutral atom, they merge with matter very easily. Impossible to get rid of. Some think they are point-like. I say they are long-handed.
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top