Books on Elementary Complex Numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the limited exposure to complex numbers in high school and the desire for accessible resources to better understand them. Participants highlight the importance of Euler's formula and the nuances of logarithms as partial inverses of exponentials. They emphasize the need to convert between linear and polar forms of complex numbers for easier calculations. Recommended resources include "The Chemistry Maths Book" by Erich Steiner and "Advanced Engineering Maths" by Kreyszig, among others. Overall, the conversation underscores the challenge of grasping complex numbers without a solid foundational background.
farleyknight
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
This result came up in my diff eq class the other day:

If i = x^2 then x = [(sqrt(2)/2) + (sqrt(2)/2)i]^2

While there aren't a lot of use for complex numbers in this class, I still feel stupid for not knowing it. Another trick that I'd like to learn about is the "complexifying the integral" trick that was mentioned in this video:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpM1jJ0lob8

AFAICT, some of this stuff people learned in high school.. WTF.. I don't remember anything like that in high school. What books did they use for this? I don't have enough time to read an advanced undergrad level complex analysis book. I'd just like enough knowedge of complex numbers to know what's going on.

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
High school doesn't focus too much on complex math. It's not useful for most people.

50% of all complex mathematics is abuse of Euler's formula.

Another 10% is remembering that logarithms are not full inverses of exponentials (they are only partial inverses). This means if e^x = e^y, it's not necessarily true that x = y.

Oh, and you have to be able to convert between linear and polar forms of complex numbers. The Linear form makes addition, subtraction, integration, and derivation easy. The polar form makes multiplication and division easy.

And then there's little bits of calculus information that's useful. Integrals are done over a path (since the notion of an "interval" does not exist in complex numbers). Differentiability as a condition is much, much stronger. Stuff like that.

Just punch through the difficulties. No one learns much about complex numbers in high school.
 
Tac-Tics said:
High school doesn't focus too much on complex math. It's not useful for most people.

50% of all complex mathematics is abuse of Euler's formula.

Another 10% is remembering that logarithms are not full inverses of exponentials (they are only partial inverses). This means if e^x = e^y, it's not necessarily true that x = y.

Oh, and you have to be able to convert between linear and polar forms of complex numbers. The Linear form makes addition, subtraction, integration, and derivation easy. The polar form makes multiplication and division easy.

And then there's little bits of calculus information that's useful. Integrals are done over a path (since the notion of an "interval" does not exist in complex numbers). Differentiability as a condition is much, much stronger. Stuff like that.

Just punch through the difficulties. No one learns much about complex numbers in high school.

I don't mind "punching though" it but it seems like an area that I would be caught off guard if a curve ball were thrown. I bet there's more tricks out there than just the square root of i and Euler's formula.. I'd just like to know where they're at :)
 
I would have thought that your requirements would be met by the chapter devoted to complex numbers in many intermediate maths, science and engineering books.

The Chemistry Maths Book, by Erich Steiner

A course in Pure Mathematics by Maggie Gow

Advanced Engineering Maths by Kreyszig

Electrical Technology by Hughes

All have good clear chapters.

The 'Demystified' series have many good volumes, but sadly not as yet one on complex numbers. However
Trigonometry Demystified has a good entry chapter.

I would not recommend looking beyond this to whole books on complex until your general background has caught up.

Then you can look for books on 'complex analysis', as mathematics using complex numbers is called.
 
Last edited:
Studiot said:
A course in Pure Mathematics by Maggie Gow
there's another book with that title?! :bugeye:

The 'Demystified' series have many good volumes, but sadly not as yet one on complex numbers.
I think there is...
http://www.mhprofessional.com/product.php?isbn=007154920X
http://books.google.com/books?id=MUsUB01biokC
 
I think there is...

My list is obviously out of date. Thanks for the info.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top