Can We Physically See an Atom?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter neoweb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Atoms cannot be physically "seen" using traditional optical microscopes due to their size being smaller than the wavelength of visible light. Advanced techniques such as Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) allow for imaging of single atoms and crystal atomic planes, respectively, but these images are based on inferred data rather than direct observation. The scattering cross section of particles influences their appearance under microscopes, leading to potential misinterpretations of size. The discussion also touches on the implications of observing atomic structures and the nature of wavefunction collapse in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic structure and size
  • Familiarity with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
  • Knowledge of photon scattering and its effects on imaging
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics and wavefunction collapse
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) and its applications in atomic imaging
  • Explore Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and its capabilities in observing crystal structures
  • Study photon scattering and its impact on the perception of particle size in microscopy
  • Investigate quantum mechanics concepts, particularly wavefunction collapse and its implications for observation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and anyone interested in atomic-scale imaging and the principles of quantum mechanics.

neoweb
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
We can't "see" an atom?

I understand we can conduct experiments from which we can "infer" or "sense" that an atom or a certain number of atoms are present but we still can't physically "see" one, even with the most powerful microscope... true?

Nevertheless, are we still able to manipulate atoms, in the sense that we can put three and only three atoms of a particular kind in a box (crudely speaking)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They have been able to "image" single atoms with the scanning tunneling electron microscope. These images are essentially averaged over short periods of time. Whether you call that "seeing" or not is up to you. If you are moved to be critical, recall that our natural seeing is more problematical, according to experimental psychologists, than we like to suppose.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agreement. We only "see" anything by bombarding it with photons and then measuring how those photons impact us and infering what they must have been up to before reaching us. If that's seeing, then I would say the STM constitute sight as well.
 
We could not see an atom with an optical microscope (i.e. gauge it's size), even if the magnification were sufficient due to scattering effects, the atom would appear larger than it actually is.

While this is obviously difficult experientally, a similar effect is seen when observing fluroesecent nanoparticles under a microscope. Even though they are only 200 nm in diameter (Measured with an SEM) they appear to be at least a couple of microns wide under a microscope.

It is the scattering cross section of a particle rather than its physical size that determines how photons scatter off it and thus how the particle would appear under a microscope.

Claude.
 
With electron microscopes (TEM), we can see images of certain crystal atomic planes separated by only about 10-15 nm. (100-150 A). This size corresponds to an axis of the crystal's unit cell.
 
Agreed, though I was referring to purely optical devices. With the aid of SEM, STM and NSOM technology, we can substantially improve our resolution.

Claude.
 
One more question: If we see the atom or maybe sub-atomic particles someday, would we see probability clouds or nice, rounded spheres? Or does the act of seeing cause wavefunction collapse ? Would quantum wierdness be apparent if we have the technology to see atoms and all..?
 
I believe, actually, and don't get me wrong, because I don't know if this has been said, that an atom is smaller than the minimal wavelength of visible light, which is violet. I'd say the scattering effect is comparable with a black pixel in a square of white being smoothed over to gray scales. That's why you cannot see one optically
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K