Do Falling Particles in Schwarzschild Solution Radiate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Passionflower
  • Start date Start date
Passionflower
Messages
1,543
Reaction score
0
Consider the Schwarzschild solution where millions of test particles move towards the event horizon.

Will the particles falling in radiate? If so, how can they radiate as they do not have any proper acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Passionflower said:
Consider the Schwarzschild solution where millions of test particles move towards the event horizon.

Will the particles falling in radiate?

If the infalling cloud is spherically symmetric, then there is no radiation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birkhoff's_theorem_(relativity)

In the case of a single infalling particle, the radiated power is proportional to the mass of the test particle raised to some power p, where p>1. (I believe p=2 for a small mass infalling toward a large mass.) The whole idea of a test particle is that we're taking the limit where its mass is small, and therefore if the radiated power is proportional to m^p, it becomes negligible, in the sense that the square of an infinitesimal number dx is negligible compared to the original number dx. If radiation by a test particle wasn't negligible in this sense, then there would be no way to define geodesics using test particles.

Passionflower said:
If so, how can they radiate as they do not have any proper acceleration?

If a mass m infalls toward another mass, yes, you will get gravitational radiation. If m is infinitesimally small (the case of a test particle), then there is no radiation. If m is not infinitesimally small, then it radiates, but it also doesn't follow a geodesic, so it's not true that it experiences zero proper acceleration.
 
bcrowell said:
In the case of a single infalling particle, the radiated power is proportional to the mass of the test particle raised to some power p, where p>1. (I believe p=2 for a small mass infalling toward a large mass.)
Agreed, assuming you speak of gravitational radiation here.

bcrowell said:
If m is not infinitesimally small, then it radiates, but it also doesn't follow a geodesic, so it's not true that it experiences zero proper acceleration.
So in addition to gravitational radiation, when it accelerates is must also radiate EM radiation do you agree?
 
Passionflower said:
Agreed, assuming you speak of gravitational radiation here.


So in addition to gravitational radiation, when it accelerates is must also radiate EM radiation do you agree?

Was your original question intended to be about gravitational radiation, or elecromagnetic radiation? I took it as a question about gravitational radiation, since you didn't state that the particles were charged.

A uniformly charged infalling spherical cloud will not radiate EM radiation. The reason is the same as for gravitational radiation: neither gravitational waves nor EM waves have propagating monopole modes.

Anyway, the issue of EM radiation by free-falling particles is complicated. The classic paper is C. Morette-DeWitt and B.S. DeWitt, "Falling Charges," Physics, 1,3-20 (1964), available at http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/EM/dewitt_physics_1_3_64.pdf This issue has been discussed many times on this forum within the last year, so there's not much point in repeating the discussion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top