Expressing start of a vector using a point on the vector

  • Thread starter Thread starter yotama9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the forces between two rods made of particles, focusing on the potential energy function and the necessary derivatives. The user is struggling to express the derivative of the vector difference between the rods in terms of their distance. They specifically need to compute the forces acting on individual particles in the rods, particularly balls one and three. Clarification is sought regarding the relationship between the forces, the distances between the particles, and the angles involved. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of deriving the correct expressions for these forces based on the given potential function.
yotama9
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys. I hope this is the right thread for my question. The question is for my project and I can assure you it's not my homework. I know the solution to my problem isn't that complicated but I just lost my self with the problem and I don't have anyone to talk with about my problem.

Anyhow, here is my problem. I need to find the forces between two rods. Each rod is constructed from 3 particles (O--O--O) and the potential between the rod is given by:
U = f(\bar r) \cdot g(\bar u_1 - \bar u_2).


Where

\bar r = \bar r_{22} - r_{21}

That is, r is the distance between the two middle particles. \bar u_i is give by

\bar u_i = \bar r_{i3} - \bar r_{i1}

which means it is the vector that shows the direction of the rod. I need to find forces between the particles:

F = \frac{dU}{dr}.

My problem is with the derivative of \bar u_1 - \bar u_2 with respect to \bar r. I tried several ways but I alway end up with \frac{du_1}{d \bar r} - \frac{du_2}{d \bar r}.

What have I missed?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is what you should end up with. Now what is the real difficulty?
 
The problem is to express the derivative as a function of the distance between the two vectors.
Thanks
 
yotama9 said:
The problem is to express the derivative as a function of the distance between the two vectors.
Thanks

Which you did. So what is the difficulty ?
 
I don't know how to compute the derivative. I feel like I'm missing something here
 
Hi, I'm bumping the problem up again.
I'll try to clarify my problem. I need to find the forces on ball number 1 and ball number 3 of each chain. I know that it should have something with the distance between the balls (\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2) and the angle (\theta[\tex]) but I&#039;m not sure what it is. <br /> <br /> Thanks.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top