One gallon of octane is equivalent to 23.4 mol of octane

  • Thread starter Thread starter grumpyasian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent
AI Thread Summary
One gallon of octane is equivalent to 23.4 moles, with a density of 0.703 g/mL. To determine how many moles of ethanol are needed to match the energy output of one gallon of octane, the energy content per mole of both fuels must be compared, assuming equal efficiency in energy conversion. The conversion process involves using the density to convert gallons to mass and then to moles. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the calculations needed to find the equivalent moles of ethanol. Understanding these conversions is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
grumpyasian
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


one gallon of octane is equivalent to 23.4 mol of octane. the density of it is .703g/mL.

Homework Equations



to travel the same distance traveled with one gallon of octane, how many moles of ethanol would you need?( assuming the car works just as well with ethanol as it does with gasoline, same efficiency of conversion of chemical energy to mechanical work.)

The Attempt at a Solution



23.2 mol C8H18(.703g C8H18/mL) (1 mol C2H6O/1 mol C8H18)

idk what to do next
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In a car, chemical energy from gasoline (or in this problem, octane) is being converted to mechanical work. Since we're assuming that both gasoline and ethanol have the same efficiency, we can simply compare the amount of energy per mole that gasoline and ethanol have. Next, you will want to calculate how many moles of ethanol are required to produce the same amount of energy as 23.4 moles of octane (that is, 1 gallon of octane). That will lead you to your answer.
 


i still don't know what i am still missing in the process of finding the answer. do i times it by 1000mL to cancel out the mL from the density or what? I am totally lost.
 


You need density to convert gallon to mass and moles.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top