The Physics of Christmas Decorations

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonyski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Christmas Physics
AI Thread Summary
Using a wire cable to suspend Christmas decorations across a 30 ft driveway raises concerns about load distribution on the brick wall anchor point. Theoretically, using angle iron anchored at two points would divide the load equally, but practical factors may lead to asymmetrical load distribution. The proposed setup involves a 12-16 inch angle iron attached to the wall, with the wire spanning the driveway at a slight angle. Suggestions include considering the use of two slings for better load distribution rather than a rigid bar. Proper tension management is crucial for safety and effectiveness in this setup.
tonyski
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Greetings all,

I am using a wire cable to suspend some Christmas decorations across my driveway. Total span is about 30 ft.

One end attaches to the exterior brick wall of my house. the other end goes through a pulley that is suspended from a huge oak tree and then down to a come-along(hand winch, cable puller) attached to the base of the tree. The weight of the decorations is about 40-50 lbs which are evenly distributed along the middle eight feet of the 30 ft span.

I am concerned about the load on the anchor point on the brick wall. Am I correct in my assumption that if I used a piece of angle Iron and anchored it at two points and then attached the cable to the angle iron, the load on each anchor point would be half of the total?
Thanks in advance,
Tony
 

Attachments

  • current design.jpg
    current design.jpg
    6.9 KB · Views: 393
  • improved design.jpg
    improved design.jpg
    7.4 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in theory, the load on each anchor point should be half the tension in the wire—if the wire pulls on each anchor point equally. In practice, the load will likely be divided asymmetrically between the anchor points, the degree of asymmetry depending on the exact anchoring setup that you use. I am not completely clear on what your angle-iron setup entails, but my instinct is that it may not be the best way to divide the load.

There is a brief guide here showing some of the methods rock climbers use to divide the tension between their ropes and anchor points. Perhaps these principles can be applied to your situation? http://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/page.php?id=2592
 
Thank you m.e.t.a..

I'll try to describe the angle iron setup. I envision using a 12-16 inch piece of angle iron anchored into the brick wall at two points. Then I'll attach the wire that spans the driveway at the center point. The wire is almost horizontal but comes off of the wall at about a 15 - 20 degree angle.

Do you feel that using 2 slings as shown in the article is a better choice than using a rigid bar across the two points?
 

Attachments

  • topview.jpg
    topview.jpg
    7.9 KB · Views: 414
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
21K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top