Gravity on a Moving Train: More or Less?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chrisrazzano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Train
AI Thread Summary
To stand on the side of a moving train, less gravity than the standard 9.8 m/s² would be beneficial, as it would reduce the force pulling a person down. The discussion raises the idea that lower gravity, similar to that on the moon, might allow for easier movement, but concerns about continuous rotation are noted. Ultimately, having less weight would make it easier to maintain balance and avoid falling off. The consensus suggests that reduced gravity is advantageous for such scenarios. Understanding the dynamics of gravity in relation to movement is crucial for this concept.
chrisrazzano
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering while watching Spider-Man 2 ..
Would you need MORE or LESS gravity than the standard of 9.8 m/s2 in order to stand on the side of a train like he did? I want to say less like the moon, but I feel like on the moon you don't stop moving and would keep rotating. So would you need more or less?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chrisrazzano said:
I was just wondering while watching Spider-Man 2 ..
Would you need MORE or LESS gravity than the standard of 9.8 m/s2 in order to stand on the side of a train like he did? I want to say less like the moon, but I feel like on the moon you don't stop moving and would keep rotating. So would you need more or less?

I don't recall the scene. Was there rotation involved?


The short answer: if you want to not fall off something, it would be a lot easier to do if you weighed less.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top