Could Inflation Create a Universe from a Pre-Existing De-Sitter Vacuum State?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dude01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inflation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between inflation and the low-entropy beginning of the universe, referencing Sean Carroll's book "From Eternity to Here." It questions whether inflation could create a universe from a pre-existing de-Sitter vacuum state, suggesting that entropy could still increase during this process. The idea is presented that a tiny region could fluctuate into a high-energy state, potentially leading to the formation of a universe like ours. The conversation also mentions a related proposal by Carroll and Jennifer Chen regarding this concept. Overall, the possibility of inflation acting on an existing vacuum state raises intriguing questions about the origins of the universe.
dude01
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I really enjoyed Sean Carroll's book "From Eternity to here" and his explanation about the connection of the arrow of time and the low-entropy event which is called big bang.

There is something I did not understand though. He stated that inflation is not an explanation for the low-entropy beginning as entropy was even lower before. On the other hand, he proposed a scenario where baby universes are created and then blown-up by inflation (and also our universe).

I ask myself though why it should not be possible that inflation created the current state "on top" of a universe that was already in a de-sitter vacuum state. Entropy would still increase while new matter is created by the inflation process. Also, as inflation expands so fast a tiny region fluctuating into the the high-energy inflational state anywhere could be sufficient to shape a universe like ours.

As there was basically "nothing" there before (just de-sitter vacuum), could such a scenario be even distinguished from one where the universe is created "from scratch" with inflation (e.g., from the baby universes)?

thanks for your answer!
Oliver Mattausch
 
Space news on Phys.org
dude01 said:
I ask myself though why it should not be possible that inflation created the current state "on top" of a universe that was already in a de-sitter vacuum state. Entropy would still increase while new matter is created by the inflation process. Also, as inflation expands so fast a tiny region fluctuating into the the high-energy inflational state anywhere could be sufficient to shape a universe like ours.
This is basically the idea that Sean Carroll and Jennifer Chen proposed:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0410270
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top