Pulsed NMR: T1 and T2 Relaxation Times of Curing Epoxy

  • Thread starter Thread starter s_stylie0728
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Epoxy Nmr
s_stylie0728
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in an advanced laboratory for physics majors, and I'm conducting a pulsed NMR experiment. My partner and I decided that we we're going to measure the T1 and T2 times of Epoxy. The idea is to explore the relationship between curing epoxy and changing T1 and T2 times. We have results to compare to, and they show that T1 increases slightly (by a factor of 1.6) while T2 shortens 27 times more than T1. This is over a three hour curing time, with measurements taken every 30 minutes.

We did obtain data that seems to follow these trends, only our epoxy cured faster than theirs.

My question to any of you who might have some insight is about the physics and chemistry occurring here. Within this experiment we've done tests showing how the concentration of paramagnetic ions and viscosity can affect T1 and T2, but as far as phase changing goes, I don't have a clear idea.

Do any of you have any ideas, recommendations, reading suggestions, or anything that might give me a clue as to how the spin-lattice and spin-spin interactions are being affected here?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert at NMR, but if I remember correctly, T1 and T2 have a different dependence on the molecular correlation times (how fast the molecules tumble in solution) of the molecules you're measuring. Because T1 relaxation is stimulated most by motions on the order of your Larmor frequency (since motions at this frequency will cause B-field fluctuations that can cause stimulated emission). Therefore, T1 has a minimum when the rate of molecular tumbling is about equal to the Larmor frequency but increases as you go to either slower or faster tumbling rates. T2 relaxation, however, depends mostly on low frequency motions (since faster motions would tend to help average out the inhomogeneities that lead to decoherence). Therefore, short tumbling times (i.e. fast molecular motions) give a longer T2 times than long tumbling times (i.e. slow molecular motions). As your epoxy cures, epoxy molecules react to form larger molecules and also the overall viscosity of the solution increases; both effects will tend to increase molecular correlation times.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top