Fermionic nature of quantum gravity

Schreiberdk
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
In this new paper today http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.4184, is it considered whether quantum gravity actually has fermionic fields rather than just bosonic fields:

Abstract
It is generally assumed that the gravitational field is bosonic. Here we show
that a simple propagating torsional theory can give rise to localized geometric
structures that can consistently be quantized as fermions under exchange. To
demonstrate this, we show that the model can be formally mapped onto the
Skyrme model of baryons, and we use well-known results from Skyrme theory.
This begs the question: Is geometry bosonic or fermionic (or both)?

So what do you think? Does this change our view on quantum gravity radically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I thought it said that gravity is still bosonic, but that one could get fermions from bosons (or rather fermions from geometry).

This reminds me of http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0407140 .
 
I haven't studied these papers, but it reminds me to the well-known bosonization
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...

Similar threads

Back
Top