Faster by James Gleick | A Review of a Rambling Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter tribdog
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion critiques James Gleick's book "Faster," expressing disappointment in its content and perceived ego. The main criticism centers on the book's exploration of how modern life accelerates, with specific mention of a chapter on reading cell phone instructions that was deemed unengaging. While some participants found the book lacking, others argue for an open-minded approach to reading, suggesting that value can be found even in less favorable works. The conversation highlights the subjective nature of literature, emphasizing that individual preferences vary and that what one person finds disappointing may resonate with another.
tribdog
Messages
768
Reaction score
17
What a rambling, ego trip we have here. Gleick writes a few good books and decides the world hangs on his every word. This book is about how humans live faster and faster lives. The chapter on why we should read the instructions that come with our new cell phones was quite the page turner. Worst book I've read in 15 years.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for letting us know.
 


I understand your frustration with the book "Faster" by James Gleick. It can be disappointing when a highly anticipated book falls short of our expectations. However, I believe it is important to approach any book with an open mind and try to find some value in it. While you may have found the book to be rambling and egotistical, others may have found it insightful and thought-provoking.

In "Faster," Gleick explores the concept of how our society is constantly speeding up, and how this affects our daily lives. While the chapter on cell phone instructions may not have been the most gripping, it does bring up an important point about how we often rush through tasks without fully understanding them. This can have consequences in both our personal and professional lives.

Furthermore, just because a book may not be to our liking does not mean it is a bad book. It is subjective and everyone has different tastes and preferences. It is unfair to dismiss a book as the "worst" simply because it did not resonate with you.

In conclusion, while "Faster" may not have been the book for you, I encourage you to keep an open mind when reading and try to find something of value in every book. After all, reading is a personal experience and what may be a disappointment to one person, may be a favorite to another.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top