Math name for asymetric-pair relationship?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Peanut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of asymmetric relationships between functions, specifically where one function (F) is not invertible, yet another function (R) can retrieve the original input (P) from the output (E) of F. This relationship is likened to public key encryption, where the security relies on the difficulty of reversing the function. Participants inquire whether mathematics has a specific term for such function pairs and if they can exist in a general sense. An example provided is the relationship between the tangent function and its inverse, arctangent, illustrating the concept of left inverses. The conversation highlights the mathematical implications of these relationships and their potential existence.
Mr Peanut
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Math name for "asymetric-pair" relationship?

Say I have a function (F) that takes an input (P) and returns an output (E). Suppose F isn't invertible so, knowing F and E, one could not reconstruct P.

Suppose also that there is another function (R) that can take E as input and returns P... without any prior knowledge about P other than it was generated with F. (R could also be non-invertible but need not necessarily be.)

I know the computer people refer to an imperfect, practical application of this idea as public key encryption or asymmetric encryption. It assumes that prime number factors for large numbers cannot be determined analytically in practical time.

But the concept has a perfect, general, underlying mathematical interpretation.

1) Does mathematics have a name for such a pair of functions?

2) Could they, in fact, exist?

3) If they do exist; are there any examples?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


If I'm not mistaken, R is a left inverse of F since, as you've defined it,
<br /> R(F(P)) = R(E) = P<br />
for any P in the domain of F. Therefore R \circ F = \text{id}.

For an easy example, consider the functions f(x) = \tan(x) and g(x) = \arctan{x} defined on the reals. Then f(g(x)) = x but g(f(x))= x+2 \pi n.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top