How Do You Solve Complex Rational Equations Without Proper Guidance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FAQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced in solving complex rational equations due to a lack of proper guidance and resources. The original poster expresses difficulty with rational equations after their teacher has been absent, leading to inadequate instruction. They seek help with specific problems, highlighting the need for foundational understanding in manipulating denominators. A suggestion is made to eliminate denominators by multiplying through by the highest powered denominator to simplify the equations. It is emphasized that solutions must be checked against the original equations to avoid invalid results.
FAQ
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Ok, so before every says that I am just looking for answers, I would like to say my teacher has been on "stress leave" for the past 5 weeks and we have been tought by a very bad "math" teacher

Im having a hard time with Rational Equations, I guess because I have no notes on it :cry: So I am looking for some help. I was given a sheet and have to have it done but since I can only do a few, I am asking for your help...

Question #1
7/s-1 - 10/s^2-s = s+2/s I don't even know where to start

Question #2
2y/y^2+3y-10 + 4/y^2+6y+5 = 3y/y^2-y-2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Start off by getting rid of the annoying denominators. Multiply through the equations by the highest powered denominator you can find and it'll turn into a much friendlier equation.

Just remember that none of the denominators can equal zero, so you must check your solutions with the original equation!

--J
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top