Theory vs Theorem: Understand the Difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics is Phun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between "theory" and "theorem," noting that theories pertain to the physical world while theorems are mathematically provable statements. A mathematical theory comprises a collection of related theorems and definitions, such as calculus or group theory. The conversation also addresses the terminology used in physics, where some theorems are referred to as laws, while similar concepts in mathematics are often called laws or principles, like the law of excluded middle or the law of large numbers. The naming conventions in mathematics are not fixed, leading to varying classifications of results, such as the difference between a lemma and a theorem. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the fluidity of terminology in both mathematics and physics.
Physics is Phun
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
What's the difference?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"Theory" usually refers to the physical world and "theorem" refers to the mathematical world.
 
A theorem is a mathematically provable statement.

A theory in mathematics is usually thought to be a non-trivial collection of related theorems and definitions like, the theory of calculus, theory of groups, etc.
 
this is sort of related, but why are some theorems in physics called laws? why arent there "laws" in math too?
 
There are. Law of excluded middle, for instance. Law of large numbers. They are also called principles. There is no immutable naming law, or principle or theorem. One man's lemma is another mans theorem. For instance's Schur's Lemma is a vital theorem, but Mackey's Theorem is just a lemma... (though things starting if...then... ought to be called propositions).
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
4K
3
Replies
104
Views
6K
Replies
72
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top