Calculating Rotational Speed Change When Adding Mass to a Rotating Object"

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdmachinist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Rotating
AI Thread Summary
When a 40 lb. rotating mass has a 1 lb. mass added to its central axis, the rotational speed will decrease, but the extent of this slowdown depends on the shapes and distribution of the masses. The moment of inertia plays a crucial role in determining how much the larger mass slows down, as it varies based on the geometry of the objects involved. The discussion raises questions about the relationship between rotational speed and the proportionality of the slowdown, suggesting that this may not follow a simple inverse square law. Understanding angular momentum is essential for accurately calculating these changes. The complexity of the scenario highlights the need for more specific information about the masses' shapes to provide a precise answer.
rdmachinist
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If a rotating 40 lb. mass has a non rotating 1 lb. mass instantly added to it's central axis, how much will the rotating mass slow down? Secondly, all else equal, does the rotational speed change the proportionality with which the smaller mass slows the larger (inverse square or some such law)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rdmachinist said:
If a rotating 40 lb. mass has a non rotating 1 lb. mass instantly added to it's central axis, how much will the rotating mass slow down? Secondly, all else equal, does the rotational speed change the proportionality with which the smaller mass slows the larger (inverse square or some such law)?
There's not enough information to answer the question: it depends on the shapes of the masses. Assuming a vertical axis:
  • If the large mass was tall and thin, and the small mass was short and fat, the large mass would slow down a lot.
  • If the large mass was short and fat, and the small mass was tall and thin, the large mass wouldn't slow very much.
Do you know about angular momentum? Or moment of inertia?
 
I'll look into these terms more thoroughly and repost at a later date if nessesary. Thanks for the reply.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top