Instanton contribution to two point function

  • Thread starter Thread starter physengineer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Point
physengineer
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I would appreciate it if anyone could help me with this problem: can there be any instantonic contribution to the following generic two-points function?

<br /> \left \langle \varphi(x) \varphi(y) \right\rangle= \int D\varphi D A \varphi(x) \varphi(y) \exp \left( -S_E [\varphi,A] \right),<br />
where S_E is an Euclidean action, \varphi bosonic field and A is the gauge field.

I am not sure even if my question makes any sense. I have seen people calculate instability of the vacuum of the action S_E, which was just from the partition function. I do not know if I have to be careful about instantons when I calcualte a two-points function or not.

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there can be an instantonic contribution to the two-point function. In general, instantons are solutions to the classical equations of motion that have finite action and represent tunneling between different vacua. In the context of the two-point function, there can be instantonic contributions that arise from the path integral over all possible configurations of the fields. These contributions can be calculated using the semiclassical approximation, by treating the instanton as a saddle point in the action and expanding around it. This can result in an extra contribution to the two-point function, depending on the specific form of the action.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top