Relativity: Simultaneous Events in Frames A and B

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of simultaneity in the context of special relativity, specifically examining how time is perceived differently in two frames of reference (A and B) moving relative to each other at a velocity of 0.86c. Participants explore the implications of time dilation and the nature of simultaneous events as experienced by observers in different frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that if 10 years pass in frame A, only 5 years pass in frame B, raising questions about the meaning of simultaneity in this context.
  • Others argue that the concept of "local time" is frame-dependent, and that each observer perceives time differently based on their relative motion.
  • A participant explains that when clocks are synchronized and then move apart, they will generally show different elapsed times upon reunion, depending on their paths and accelerations.
  • One participant emphasizes that time dilation occurs differently depending on which frame is being considered, noting that both A and B experience time dilation relative to each other.
  • Another participant introduces the Lorentz Transform as a necessary tool for comparing time coordinates of events in different frames, highlighting the importance of spatial position in these calculations.
  • A later reply provides a visual analogy using a space-time diagram to illustrate how events that are simultaneous in one frame may not be simultaneous in another, emphasizing the complexity of a 4-dimensional universe.
  • One participant expresses difficulty in visualizing the 4-dimensional nature of the problem and requests an analogy to simplify the concept using lower dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principles of time dilation and the frame-dependent nature of simultaneity. However, there remains disagreement on how to conceptualize and visualize these ideas, particularly in relation to 4-dimensional space-time.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding of 4-dimensional space-time and express a desire for analogies that could clarify these concepts in more familiar dimensions.

Snip3r
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
When 2 objects A,B are moving wrt to each other (lets say @0.86c)then from frame A if local time is 10 years then time at B is 5 years. What does this mean?is it any event happening now in A(10 years) is simultaneous with the events happened in B when its clock ticked 5 years?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When 2 objects A,B are moving wrt to each other (lets say @0.86c)then from frame A if local time is 10 years then time at B is 5 years. What does this mean?


You can't specifiy just "local time" because in the frame of the other object, a similar thing is happening. The rate at which times flows depends on the individual observer.


If you start with clocks together, separate them, and bring them back together, they will generally differ (the path with greater deviation from an inertial path will accumulate less time). If two clocks compare readings, move apart, and then later reunite and compare readings again, if one clock moved inertially between meetings while the other accelerated at some point, the one that accelerated will have elapsed less time.

In special relativity greater speed means less elapsed time; In general relativity (with gravity) we find that greater gravitational potential also slows time.
 
Last edited:
Naty1 said:
You can't specifiy just "local time" because in the frame of the other object, a similar thing is happening. The rate at which times flows depends on the individual observer.
why not local time?i m talking considering A as my frame and called its time local. Consider this 2 objects A and B meet at a point and synchronized to read 0. Now A and B continue to move as they did earlier(let relative velocity be 0.86c for convenience). Now if i am in A and 10 years passed for me then only 5 years has passed for B according to me isn't it?i want to know what this means?is it any event happening now in A(10 years) is simultaneous with the events happened in B when its clock ticked 5 years?
 
Snip3r said:
When 2 objects A,B are moving wrt to each other (lets say @0.86c)then from frame A if local time is 10 years then time at B is 5 years. What does this mean?
You do understand that when you say 2 objects are moving with respect to each other at 0.86c, you don't mean they are both moving at the same time at that rate, do you? Don't you in your mind think about one frame at a time--from A's frame, B is moving, and from B's frame, A is moving? You don't think that both are moving at the same 0.86c which would add up to a total speed of 1.72c, do you? So when you are thinking about A's frame, B is the one that is experiencing speed which means B is the one that is experiencing time dilation. Conversely, when you are thinking about B's frame, A is the one that is experiencing speed which means A is the one that is experiencing time dilation.

Time dilation simply means that moving clocks are ticking at a slower rate than stationary clocks according to whichever frame you are considering using the Einstein's formula:

τ = t√(1-β2) = t/γ

where τ is the time on a moving clock and t is the time on a stationary clock.

So, yes, in frame A, when 10 years ticks by, 5 years will tick by for B since he is moving at 0.86c in A's frame.
Snip3r said:
is it any event happening now in A(10 years) is simultaneous with the events happened in B when its clock ticked 5 years?
When you're talking about comparing the time coordinate of an event in two frames of reference, you need to use the Lorentz Transform which is:

t' = γ(t-βx)

So clearly, these are not the same formulas because the LT involves the location of the event as well as the time. But if you are careful to always calculate the location of B as being x = β*t, then:

t' = γ(t-β2t) = γt(1-β2)

And since γ = 1/√(1-β2) then

t' = t(1-β2)/√(1-β2) = t(√(1-β2)) = t/γ
 
Snip3r said:
When 2 objects A,B are moving wrt to each other (lets say @0.86c)then from frame A if local time is 10 years then time at B is 5 years. What does this mean?is it any event happening now in A(10 years) is simultaneous with the events happened in B when its clock ticked 5 years?

Snip3r, the answer to your question is "Yes." That is, A's clock can be reading 10 years while the clock on B's world line (that is simultaneous with A in A's frame) is reading 5 years.

See if you can comprehend this space-time diagram below, because it depicts this situation.

Red and blue guys are moving in opposite directions at the same speed with respect to a rest frame, and carry clocks that give us readings for t1 and t2. I have labeled times t1 and t2 along the X4 axis in each of the red and blue frames. The time, t1, reads exactly the same in the red frame and the blue frame. The t2 times are also exactly the same.

The thing that provides the enlightenment for this problem is the understanding of the 4-dimensional universe. Observers move along their world lines (their own X4 dimension) at the speed of light, c. The red guy and the blue guy live in different 3-dimensional worlds, because their 3-D worlds cut across cross-sections of the 4-dimensional universe at different angles (X1 and X4 axes are always rotated such that the 45-degree angle lines, corresponding photons (green lines in sketch), always bisect the angle between X1 and X4 for any frame--that's why the speed of light is c in every frame).

You can see that red's clock reading time, t1, is simultaneous with blue's clock reading t2 in the blue 3-D world shown below. But, when red is at his space-time position at t2, the 3-D world he is living in cuts across a cross-section of the 4-D universe in a direction that includes the blue guy when he (blue) is at blue's t1 position. Thus, red and blue literallly live in two different 3-D worlds which are different cross-sections of the 4-dimensional universe.
Time_Dilation-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
bobc2
thanks. i understood this from your STD if A' is an event in A, B' in B and A' is simultaneous with B' in A then it doesn't mean B' is simultaneous with A' in B. however i find it hard to visualize may be its because it is hard to imagine 4-D. is there a way by which you could draw an analogy between 4-D and 3-D, 3-D worlds and 2-D worlds and explain the scenario in only 3-dimensions?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
817
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K