Schools Physics grad school after non-physics undergrad?

AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a physics graduate degree with a background in computer science is feasible, though the likelihood of acceptance may vary. Applicants must demonstrate that their education and experience align with the standard physics curriculum, which may require additional coursework in physics. Focusing on quantum computing or quantum information theory could potentially enhance the chances of admission, as these areas intersect with computer science and may appeal to programs looking for diverse skill sets. However, the realism of this approach is debated, with some suggesting that without a strong physics foundation, it may be challenging to gain entry into competitive programs.
Coin
Messages
564
Reaction score
1
I have a bachelor's in CS with a math focus (wound up 1 credit short of a math minor). I have been out of college for about six years now and working as a software developer during that time. Off and on since leaving college I have been self-teaching myself physics. Sometimes I daydream of going back for graduate school and getting a masters (or more) in physics. I am particularly fascinated by quantum computers, and my best case scenario is if I could find a graduate program where I could somehow be involved in quantum computer research-- in fact, I'm mostly interested in the idea of grad school because this is how I imagine one would get involved with quantum computing research right now.

Some questions--

1. Is this idea-- going for physics graduate school, after a non-physics undergrad degree-- even possible?

2. If I were to attempt to apply for physics graduate school, what would I need to do or how would I need to prepare for it? (Assume I'm okay with the idea of an answer to this question being something that takes years to implement…)

3. I have this idea in my head that if I specifically try to focus on quantum computers or the theory of quantum information, that it might make it easier to get into a program without having physics credentials ahead of time because quantum computing exists to an extent at an intersection of fields-- you need to be able to understand not just ideas from physics but also from computational complexity theory or information theory, so I imagine some programs might be amenable to letting in a CS person who can come in saying "I understand complexity theory very well but I need more education on physics". Is this line of thought realistic at all?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) It is possible. Whether or not it's likely is a different matter.
2) You'd need to convince a selection committee that your education and/or experience is the equivalent of a standard undergraduate physics curriculum.
3) Not very realistic, in my opinion.
 
Coin said:
I have a bachelor's in CS with a math focus (wound up 1 credit short of a math minor). I have been out of college for about six years now and working as a software developer during that time. Off and on since leaving college I have been self-teaching myself physics. Sometimes I daydream of going back for graduate school and getting a masters (or more) in physics. I am particularly fascinated by quantum computers, and my best case scenario is if I could find a graduate program where I could somehow be involved in quantum computer research-- in fact, I'm mostly interested in the idea of grad school because this is how I imagine one would get involved with quantum computing research right now.

Some questions--

1. Is this idea-- going for physics graduate school, after a non-physics undergrad degree-- even possible?

2. If I were to attempt to apply for physics graduate school, what would I need to do or how would I need to prepare for it? (Assume I'm okay with the idea of an answer to this question being something that takes years to implement…)

3. I have this idea in my head that if I specifically try to focus on quantum computers or the theory of quantum information, that it might make it easier to get into a program without having physics credentials ahead of time because quantum computing exists to an extent at an intersection of fields-- you need to be able to understand not just ideas from physics but also from computational complexity theory or information theory, so I imagine some programs might be amenable to letting in a CS person who can come in saying "I understand complexity theory very well but I need more education on physics". Is this line of thought realistic at all?

Thanks.

Once again, you may want to read this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=64966

Zz.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top