Understanding Glauber Coherent States

  • Thread starter Thread starter paris1244bc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coherent States
paris1244bc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been doing some reading into Glauber Coherent States and I am struggling to get a grasp on how they are composed, ie. how to determine when they exist. I kind of get the idea (qualitatively speaking) let me try to explain what I think;

- They are composed of superpositions of many of the quantum harmonic oscillator (single particle) states, where the amplitudes of each of these states is such that it gives a pendulum like 'hump' (thinking of the graph of probability density) that swings back and forth within the potential, the coherent state exists only when this pendulum like behaviour is observed. Is this correct?

I just don't know how to define them mathematically and I'm getting lost in the text, I'll persist with reading so I may get the answer eventually but if someone could someone help me to understand it clearly I would be grateful. I have found a few texts so far but they seem to be going over my head, I am currently drudging through "Optical Coherence & Quantum Optics" (Mandel & Wolf) specifically chapter 11.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can construct coherent states starting with

(a-z)|z\rangle = 0

where a is the annihilation operator and z is an arbitrary complex number.

Solving this equation tells you that |z> is

|z\rangle = e^{-|z|^2/2}\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{z^n}{\sqrt{n!}}|n\rangle = e^{-|z|^2/2} e^{a^\dagger z}|0\rangle

The time evolution can be calculated using

H = \omega a^\dagger a

(where I omitted the 1/2 b/v it's trivial) and

|z,t\rangle = e^{-iHt}|z,0\rangle = |z(t)\rangle

with

z(t) = e^{-i\omega t}\,z(0)

So time evolution takes a coherent state with z=z(0) inot a new coherent state z(t) with constant |z|
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top