Differentiation of a vektorfield

  • Thread starter Thread starter klabautermann
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiation
klabautermann
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
hi!

i flipped through my notes on a class on general relativity this morning and i found an expression which doesn't make sense to me. I am not sure if don't understand the last term in the last equality or it just dosn't make sense. i would appreciate your oppinion.
a,b are abstract indicies. everything else are coordinate indicies.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You should explain your notations...
 
of course. as i said, a and b are abstract indicies, i,j,m,k are components with respect to a basis. bared and not bared components and differential operators correspond to different coordinate systems.
 
Ok but what are \partial<sub>a</sub>, the quotation? x is a vector?
 
\partial_{a}
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top