Can Gamma Radiation Be Focused Using Reflective Materials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neitrino
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Focusing gamma radiation is challenging, but several methods exist to intensify and direct these rays. Free electron lasers (FELs) can produce focused soft x-ray beams, while crystal Bragg diffraction can focus specific gamma or x-ray energies. Compton scattering can also generate narrow beams of high-energy gammas. For radioactive isotopes, crystal Bragg diffraction is the most applicable method. Overall, advancements in materials and techniques may enhance the ability to manipulate gamma radiation effectively.
Neitrino
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Dear PF,

Is is possible to focus somehow gamma radiation? Suppose d'like to intensify gamma rays and I want to focus it... is it possible to do it... ?

Are there any materials that may "reflect" gamma rays.. to use as a "reflector" thus intensifying ...

thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
1) FELs (free electron lasers) can create focused soft x-ray beams.

2) If you detect one annihilation gamma from positron annihilation, you can "create" (tag) a beam of annihilation gammas 180 degrees away in the opposite direction.

3) Crystal (Bragg) diffraction (actually reflection) off of crystal planes (like quartz 310) from bent crystals can focus specific gamma or x-ray energies in one plane.

4) Bremsstrahlung radiation is peaked in the direction of the incident electron. [at low energies, the radiation pattern is a doughnut ring]

5) Compton scattering of a laser beam off of a high energy electron beam creates a very narrow beam of high energy gammas.

Bob S
 
Thank you Bob S for your reply...

If the source is radioactive isotope then I guess only Crystal Bragg diffraction might be applicable . . . correct ?
 
X-rays or soft gamma rays can be focussed by reflection (Bragg or total reflection at a highly polished surface), Fresnel zone plates, or refractive lenses (the index of refraction is slightly less than 1)

Rosat was an x-ray satelite that used total reflection
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top