Help! I'm Struggling with Graph Theory Exam!

AI Thread Summary
Struggling with graph theory, the user seeks clarity on calculating eigenvalues of adjacency matrices, particularly in relation to a professor's question about the sum of elements in a specific row. They express confusion over their lecture notes and the connection between eigenvalues and the adjacency matrix. The discussion confirms that the graphs in question are undirected and do not allow loops. A resource from Berkeley is shared, containing theorems on eigenvalues that may assist in understanding. Overall, the user is looking for additional resources and clarification on these concepts.
Niels
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm having an exam on graph theory next week and I'm having some problem with understanding the meaning of calculating eigenvalues of adjacency matrices for graphs. My notes suck from the lectures and I'm totally lost...

Our professor asked "What is the sum of elements in row k of the adjacency matrix?" and showed an example where he calculated the eigenvalues of C_3 (2, -1, -1) but then my notes stop and and I can't connect the eigenvalues to the question...

Any input on this subject most welcome... Any one know any good resource on the net where I can find more on this??
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know of websites on that topic, though I don't doubt there are some.

Out of curiosity, in connection with your problem, are the graphs understood to be undirected? Can a node be adjacent to itself, i.e. are "loops" allowed in the type of graph you are talking about? I am pretty sure that different authors put different restrictions on the properties of a graph when defining that term.
 
The graphs are undirected without loops...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top