How does the presence of a metal tube affect the magnetic field in a solenoid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter polaris90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solenoid Work
AI Thread Summary
The presence of a metal tube in a solenoid enhances the magnetic field due to the properties of ferromagnetic materials, which increase permeability. When the metal tube is removed, the magnetic field decreases because the wire alone lacks the magnetic properties needed to strengthen the field. In applications where the solenoid moves an internal armature, a non-magnetic tube is preferred to maintain coil shape without affecting the magnetic field. Conversely, for solenoids acting on external armatures, an iron core significantly boosts the magnetic field. Understanding the role of core materials is crucial for optimizing solenoid performance.
polaris90
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I know an electromagnet can be created by wrapping a wire around a metal tube and putting some current across the wire. This creates a magnetic field. my question is why does the magnetic field decrease when the metal tube is removed leaving just the wire?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends upon what sort of solenoid you refer to.
If the solenoid moves an armature inside the tube then you do not want a core of magnetic material as it will not help to increase the magnetic field affecting the magnetic armature. A non-magnetic tube (former) is just needed to maintain the shape of the coil.

If your solenoid acts on an external armature then an Iron (ferromagnetic) core will increase the field considerably due to the increased Permeability. Non-magnetic metal like aluminium will make no difference.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Question about Activating Solenoids that are facing each other
Replies
1
Views
1K
B Magnet inside a solenoid with current
Replies
7
Views
1K
Can Electromagnetic Fields Generate Net Thrust with a Metal Plate?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Where is the strongest intensity of an electromagnetic field produced by a solenoid?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I How induction works within a coil (nuances of it)
Replies
6
Views
2K
Non-Uniform Magnetic Field Calculations
Replies
9
Views
2K
Engineering Inductance of a layered Solenoid?
Replies
2
Views
996
Piece of metal being carried through an inductor
Replies
3
Views
3K
Understanding self-inductance in a solenoid.
Replies
3
Views
1K
Need an electromagnet to play Chess
Replies
37
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top