Mamal which ate dinosaurs discovered

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dinosaurs
AI Thread Summary
A newly discovered fossil in China, dating back 130 million years, has significantly changed the understanding of the relationship between dinosaurs and early mammals. The fossil belongs to a carnivorous mammal named Repenomamus robustus, which was approximately the size of an opossum and contained the remains of young dinosaurs, specifically psittacosaurs, in its stomach. This finding challenges the long-held belief that early mammals were small, mouse-like creatures that primarily evaded dinosaurs. The fossil's positioning of the stomach contents mirrors that of modern mammals, suggesting more complex behaviors and dietary habits than previously thought. The discovery indicates that mammals were already diversifying during the age of dinosaurs, contradicting the notion that significant mammalian evolution occurred only after the dinosaurs' extinction. This revelation opens up new avenues for understanding mammalian evolution and the ecological dynamics of that era.
wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4165973.stm

BBC said:
An astonishing new fossil unearthed in China has overturned the accepted view about the relationship between dinosaurs and early mammals.

The specimen belongs to a primitive mammal about 130 million years old and its stomach contents show that it ate young dinosaurs called psittacosaurs.

The mammal with the dinosaur in its stomach belongs to a carnivorous mammal called Repenomamus robustus, which was about the size of an opossum.

"At first, we thought it was a placental mammal carrying an embryo. But then we looked more closely and saw it was a dinosaur," said co-author Dr Meng Jin, curator of palaeontology at the American Museum of Natural History.

"The position was also interesting; it was located in the lower left side of the fossil - exactly the position where the stomach is located in extant mammals."

Turns out that the stuff I learned as a kid about the only mamals during the time of the Dinosaurs being little mice who scurried away everytime a Dinosaur came along might not be totally true afterall.

Just imagine how many evolutionary gaps this thing must fill in, and how many wrong assumptions it must correct! I've always learned that the first mamals were just mice-like things, and all else evolved from them after the Dinosaurs went extinct. Now we know about this new predacious mamal from 135 million years ago that could have spawned so many of the creatures we know today.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Cool, eh?
The first mammals appeared sometime around 165-200 million years ago (not sure what form...likely those mice/shrew things you're thinking of).
These mammals diverged into the marsupial & placental lineages when the dinos were still around (c. 125 million years ago).
As for the first primates, it seems there is some question whether or not they were around when the dinos were. The first unequivocal primate fossils were from after the dino's time (c. 55 million year ago) but there are some possible ones from 85 million years ago.
My impression is that the range of mammals was still fairly limited during the dino's reign and the more rapid diversification of mammals didn't occur until after the KT event.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top